2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing neuronal activation by functional quantitative susceptibility mapping under a visual paradigm: A group level comparison with BOLD fMRI and PET

Abstract: Dynamic changes of brain-tissue magnetic susceptibility provide the basis for functional MR imaging (fMRI) via T2*-weighted signal-intensity modulations. Promising initial work on a detection of neuronal activity via quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM) has been published but consistently reported on ill-understood positive and negative activation patterns (Balla et al., 2014;Chen and Calhoun, 2015a). We set out to (i) demonstrate that fQSM can exploit established fMRI data acquisition and processing met… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the phase signal contains biologically relevant information about the vasculature contained within voxels that exhibits susceptibility-related signal changes in response to neuronal activity (Hoogenraad et al, 2001). Hence, considering both magnitude and phase changes helps to enhance the mapping of the BOLD response in terms of sensitivity and spatial specificity in complex-based fMRI analysis (Arja et al, 2010; Calhoun et al, 2002; Kociuba and Rowe, 2016; Lee et al, 2009; Rowe and Logan, 2004; 2005; Tomasi and Caparelli, 2007; Yu et al, 2015), and enables functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (Balla et al, 2014; Bianciardi et al, 2014; Chen and Calhoun, 2016; Özbay et al, 2016). …”
Section: Phase-based Denoising Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the phase signal contains biologically relevant information about the vasculature contained within voxels that exhibits susceptibility-related signal changes in response to neuronal activity (Hoogenraad et al, 2001). Hence, considering both magnitude and phase changes helps to enhance the mapping of the BOLD response in terms of sensitivity and spatial specificity in complex-based fMRI analysis (Arja et al, 2010; Calhoun et al, 2002; Kociuba and Rowe, 2016; Lee et al, 2009; Rowe and Logan, 2004; 2005; Tomasi and Caparelli, 2007; Yu et al, 2015), and enables functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (Balla et al, 2014; Bianciardi et al, 2014; Chen and Calhoun, 2016; Özbay et al, 2016). …”
Section: Phase-based Denoising Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of the field‐probe/real‐time correction setup in this comparison is that it typically requires only minor changes to the imaging pulse sequence , as it operates rather independently, except for the effect of the field gradients on the probe signals, which, without further precaution, precludes a sampling of probe signals while gradients are switched on. Apart from our 3D gradient‐echo QSM sequence, it has also been shown to, for example, improve gradient‐echo echo‐planar imaging–based functional MRI , which could also yield data for functional QSM , or allow physiology tracking . A navigator‐based approach, on the other hand, needs to be individually adjusted to every scanner pulse sequence, and the acquisition of additional data also potentially increases scan times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, measuring vascular dynamics has proved to be important for early diagnosis of critical cerebrovascular and neurological disorders, such as stroke and Alzheimer's disease [2]. Existing tools for the measurement of cerebral vascular dynamics rely on functional imaging techniques, for example functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), positive emission tomography (PET), and optical imaging [1,3]. Importantly, mathematical models have been proposed for these neuroimaging methods, which provide valuable insight into the relation between the measured signals, and the underlying physiological parameters, such as cerebral blood flow, oxygen consumption, and rate of metabolism [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%