2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/817/1/22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PROBING FINAL STAGES OF STELLAR EVOLUTION WITH X-RAY OBSERVATIONS OF SN 2013ej

Abstract: Massive stars shape their surroundings with mass loss from winds during their lifetimes. Fast ejecta from supernovae, from these massive stars, shocks this circumstellar medium. Emission generated by this interaction provides a window into the final stages of stellar evolution, by probing the history of mass loss from the progenitor. Here we use Chandra and Swift x-ray observations of the type II-P/L SN 2013ej to probe the history of mass loss from its progenitor. We model the observed x-rays as emission from … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
45
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dust-scattering Model SN 2013ej exhibits X-ray evidence for an interaction with tenuous CSM (Chakraborti et al 2016), the density of which is consistent with the mass loss of a typical RSG wind. Moreover, as we show in Section 3, CSM interaction persists at late times, implying the presence of a highly extended tenuous CSM envelope.…”
Section: Spectropolarimetric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Dust-scattering Model SN 2013ej exhibits X-ray evidence for an interaction with tenuous CSM (Chakraborti et al 2016), the density of which is consistent with the mass loss of a typical RSG wind. Moreover, as we show in Section 3, CSM interaction persists at late times, implying the presence of a highly extended tenuous CSM envelope.…”
Section: Spectropolarimetric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…We suspect that the unusual polarization characteristics of SN 2013ej are the result of CSM interaction, which we already know was occurring during the recombination phase, based on the persistent X-ray emission (Chakraborti et al 2016). We also know that the CSM interaction was geometrically asymmetric based on the multipeaked morphology of broad Hα emission at late times (see Figure 9).…”
Section: Polarization Via Aspherical Csm Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Depending on the decline in the light curve, SNeII can be further subclassified as SNIIL for a linear decline and SNIIP for sustained brightness before an eventual decline. However, drawing distinctions between SNIILandIIP is less obvious considering an existing continuum of observed properties (Faran et al 2014;Sanders et al 2015;Chakraborti et al 2016;Gall et al 2015;Pejcha & Prieto 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%