2013
DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/24/9/095001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probing-error compensation using 5 degree of freedom force/moment sensor for coordinate measuring machine

Abstract: A new probing and compensation method is proposed to improve the three-dimensional (3D) measuring accuracy of 3D shapes, including irregular surfaces. A new tactile coordinate measuring machine (CMM) probe with a five-degree of freedom (5-DOF) force/moment sensor using carbon fiber plates was developed. The proposed method efficiently removes the anisotropic sensitivity error and decreases the stylus deformation and the actual contact point estimation errors that are major error components of shape measurement… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When measuring with a traditional trigger probe, there will be a time delay between the touch of the probe and the generation of the trigger signal which will cause the motion axis to move a certain distance (called a pretravel error) [14,15]. The pretravel error is composed of the displacement of the trigger mechanism and elastic deformation of the stylus.…”
Section: Influence Of Surface Slope On Uncertainty Of Cmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When measuring with a traditional trigger probe, there will be a time delay between the touch of the probe and the generation of the trigger signal which will cause the motion axis to move a certain distance (called a pretravel error) [14,15]. The pretravel error is composed of the displacement of the trigger mechanism and elastic deformation of the stylus.…”
Section: Influence Of Surface Slope On Uncertainty Of Cmmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang Z et al used NURBS curves to obtain the equation for the probe tip centre trajectory and fitted it to obtain the 3D normal vector [9]. Lee M et al used the 3D output of the force sensor in the probe as the normal vector for the probe radius correction [10]. Wozniak A et al applied a fuzzy logic algorithm and geometric criteria to select the most likely contact points on each successive arc [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, compensation in the 2D plane introduces extra deviation into the final results with traditional curve compensation methods [2,7,13,14]. Park et al, Lee and Cho, and Liang et al used the 3D output of the force sensor in the probe as the compensation vector [15][16][17]. Nevertheless, the research results of Rak and Woźniak [14] showed that the accuracy of radius compensation from the force sensor is 0.1 mm on the edge of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%