1992
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370100404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probative aspects of the medical evaluation for child sexual abuse

Abstract: The medical evaluation of a child for sex abuse has been viewed by some as an acid-test for the presence of abuse. This article examines the medical evaluation for child sexual abuse, evidence potentially revealed by the examination, and the probative value of such evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another risk is that practitioners might commit errors that contaminate the chain of evidence and hinder a prosecutor's ability to present compelling evidence in a legal proceeding. Verbal report has a critically important role in sexual abuse investigations, as it is common for medical examination of child victims to yield unremarkable findings or equivocal findings (Bays & Chadwick, 1993;Davis, 1987;Monteleone et al, 1994;Nohejl, 1992). Because there is no known psychological profile for the diagnosis of child sexual abuse (Bruck, Ceci, & Hembrooke, 1998;O'Donohue, 1991), a child victim's verbal report is likely to be the primary evidence in a sexual abuse case (Bottoms, 1993;Bruck et al, 1998;Pipe & Goodman, 1991).…”
Section: The Role Of School Psychologistsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Another risk is that practitioners might commit errors that contaminate the chain of evidence and hinder a prosecutor's ability to present compelling evidence in a legal proceeding. Verbal report has a critically important role in sexual abuse investigations, as it is common for medical examination of child victims to yield unremarkable findings or equivocal findings (Bays & Chadwick, 1993;Davis, 1987;Monteleone et al, 1994;Nohejl, 1992). Because there is no known psychological profile for the diagnosis of child sexual abuse (Bruck, Ceci, & Hembrooke, 1998;O'Donohue, 1991), a child victim's verbal report is likely to be the primary evidence in a sexual abuse case (Bottoms, 1993;Bruck et al, 1998;Pipe & Goodman, 1991).…”
Section: The Role Of School Psychologistsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Though cases of child maltreatment in general are difficult to determine with certainty, it is especially difficult to determine when an episode of child sexual abuse has occurred, in part because of the lack of precise definitions about what constitutes such maltreatment (Haugaard & Reppucci, 1988; National Research Council, 1993). Further, the fact that physical evidence is not present in a substantial number of cases, and the controversy surrounding the significance of evidence even when it exists (Haslam, 1989; Marshall, Puls, & Davidson, 1988; Nohejl, 1992), poses problems for the investigator who is trying to determine if allegations of sexual abuse have merit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%