1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0504-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
105
0
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Central limit theorems of type (44) has a substantial history. The classical Lindeberg-Feller (cf Section 9.1 in Chow and Teicher (1988)) concerns independent random variables. Hoeffding and Robbins (1948) proved a central limit theorem under m-dependence.…”
Section: Central Limit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central limit theorems of type (44) has a substantial history. The classical Lindeberg-Feller (cf Section 9.1 in Chow and Teicher (1988)) concerns independent random variables. Hoeffding and Robbins (1948) proved a central limit theorem under m-dependence.…”
Section: Central Limit Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Doob's martingale convergence theorem (see, e.g., [25] or [26], or any textbook on advanced probability theory), it therefore converges on a set of -measure one. Moreover, converges on a set of measure one, being a positive super-martingale as well [ Thus, must converge on a set of measure one.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible choice is the Hellinger distance (25) and (26) Like the square distance, the Hellinger distance is bounded by both the relative entropy and the absolute distance and (27)…”
Section: Static MDLmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this paper, we shall deal with random non-self-maps. First, by employing a result of Chow and Teicher [6], sufficient conditions are obtained for a random non-self-map, so that the existence of a deterministic fixed point is equivalent to the existence of a random fixed point. Thus every fixed point theorem produces a random fixed point theorem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%