Risk Modeling for Hazards and Disasters 2018
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-804071-3.00007-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probability Gain From Seismicity-Based Earthquake Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of seismic events and corresponding magnitudes in the research area are shown in table 3. The value of k is fixed between [1,5] for experimentation to find the best sparsity level. Figure 9 shows F1 in the classification results under different values of k, and it can be seen that the best classification performance of the detection model is achieved with k = 3.…”
Section: Description Of Experiments Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of seismic events and corresponding magnitudes in the research area are shown in table 3. The value of k is fixed between [1,5] for experimentation to find the best sparsity level. Figure 9 shows F1 in the classification results under different values of k, and it can be seen that the best classification performance of the detection model is achieved with k = 3.…”
Section: Description Of Experiments Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, SFSs encompass two main research areas [5,6]: (1) long-term seismic forecasting and (2) short-term seismic forecasting. Long-term seismic forecasting involves predicting regions where destructive earthquakes may occur in the coming years or decades, and there have been numerous successful cases [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%