2010
DOI: 10.1080/15732470802664001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic seismic slope stability assessment of geostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the analysis of slope stability under seismic conditions, earthquake effects can be included in the limit equilibrium analysis by applying a horizontal acceleration to the weight of the sliding mass and recomputing the factor of safety. Despite its limitations, this simple pseudo-static approach captures wide acceptance (Christian and Urzua 1998;Tsompanakis et al 2012). In this technique, an empirical relationship between the horizontal seismic coefficient K h and the maximal acceleration a max is generally used to obtain the K h before calculating the seismic forces in a pseudo-static analysis, as proposed by Noda et al (1975) …”
Section: Development Of Fragility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For the analysis of slope stability under seismic conditions, earthquake effects can be included in the limit equilibrium analysis by applying a horizontal acceleration to the weight of the sliding mass and recomputing the factor of safety. Despite its limitations, this simple pseudo-static approach captures wide acceptance (Christian and Urzua 1998;Tsompanakis et al 2012). In this technique, an empirical relationship between the horizontal seismic coefficient K h and the maximal acceleration a max is generally used to obtain the K h before calculating the seismic forces in a pseudo-static analysis, as proposed by Noda et al (1975) …”
Section: Development Of Fragility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to Schultz et al (2010), in contrast to nominal failure probabilities estimated from reliability indices, fragility curves provide a richer, more comprehensive perspective on the reliabilities of geostructures, because they are functions rather than points. In the past, significant efforts, based on different strategies and approaches, were invested into attempts to define, evaluate, and quantify the fragility of geostructures (Kennedy et al 1980;Gardoni et al 2002;Dawson and Hall 2006;Jeong and Elnashai 2007;Ebeling et al 2008;Apel et al 2009;Vorogushyn et al 2009;Schultz et al 2010;Tsompanakis et al 2012;Kim and Sitar 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…PGA was used as the intensity measure and damage states were based on the computed deformation of the slope crest. A similar approach was employed by Lagaros et al (2009) and Tsompanakis et al (2010), who also used PGA as an intensity measure. However unlike most examples of fragility curves, which typically use a physical damage descriptor to define damage states, the authors used target factors of safety from Greek seismic design codes as damage states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%