2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic risk assessment of water distribution system in Hyderabad, Pakistan reveals unacceptable health hazards and areas for rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To estimate the non-carcinogenic risk from exposure to water polluted with trace elements, the Hazard Quotient (HQ) was calculated for each trace element as shown in Eq. 5 [18,25]. (5) ...where R f D is the reference dose for oral and dermal exposure routes [26].…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the non-carcinogenic risk from exposure to water polluted with trace elements, the Hazard Quotient (HQ) was calculated for each trace element as shown in Eq. 5 [18,25]. (5) ...where R f D is the reference dose for oral and dermal exposure routes [26].…”
Section: Human Health Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cholerae has been done by utilizing molecular based detection to assess the burden of Cholera. The outbreaks of cholera in Pakistan could be attributed to the poor sanitation/environmental condition as seen in typhoid outbreaks in Hyderabad [ 33 ], and also usage of contaminated water or consumption of unhygienic/contaminated food [ 34 ]. In this study high frequency of toxigenic cholera has been showed in Karachi city waste water, and it has been speculated that as Karachi is a metropolitical city where there is poor sanitation system [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though unlikely, in developing countries, residents in remote and rural areas may directly use such kinds of water for drinking purposes. 10 There was no noncarcinogenic risk detected in people swimming in the Esil river and its tributaries (HI < 1). The variation of risk values between the two scenarios could be explained by not only the exposure parameters but also the HMs' concentrations as input variables, i.e., the average values of HMs during the summer stayed at lower concentration levels in comparison to those of the whole period (in Table S9).…”
Section: Seasonal Variations Of Heavy Metals In the Figurementioning
confidence: 94%