2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Risk Assessment of Oil and Gas Infrastructures for Seismic Extreme Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety level of land-use planning can then be improved (Alileche et al, 2016). Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) methods are also extensively used in the field of safety management and risk analysis Urlainis et al, 2015;Špačková et al, 2013). With the rapid development of information and computer technology, big data theory and advanced techniques were also introduced to study the mechanism of safety and accident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety level of land-use planning can then be improved (Alileche et al, 2016). Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) methods are also extensively used in the field of safety management and risk analysis Urlainis et al, 2015;Špačková et al, 2013). With the rapid development of information and computer technology, big data theory and advanced techniques were also introduced to study the mechanism of safety and accident.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a higher social vulnerability in the face of loss of continuous operation (Kröger, 2008). The main objective was to improve the social preparedness for the growing landslide risk, according to the suggestions of several authors (Gene Corley et al, 1998;Baldridge and Marshall, 2011;Urlainis et al, 2014Urlainis et al, , 2015. This led to the development of several approaches and frameworks for increasing the resiliency of society exposed to the risk (Kröger, 2008;Cagno et al, 2011, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step, the expected damage state as a result of a seismic event is formulated in terms of fragility curve. The fragility curve expresses the probability of reaching or exceeding certain damage states for a given level of IM [13][14][15][16]. This function is fully defined by determination of two parameters: median capacity of the component to resist the damage state ( ) and standard deviation of the capacity ( ).…”
Section: System's Seismic Vulnerabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%