2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic pseudo-static analysis of pile foundations in liquefiable soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it had encouraged many simplified methods of analysis to be sought such as Beam-on-Winkler-Springs, Bradley, et al (2011), pseudo-static method, Tabesh and Poulos (2001) and the limit equilibrium method, Dobry, et al (2003). Bradley, et al (2011), have proposed a probabilistic framework for Pseudostatic analysis of pile foundations in liquefied and lateral spreading soils. A pseudo-static method involves applying static displacements and forces to a typical beam-spring model, has been used in Monte Carlo simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it had encouraged many simplified methods of analysis to be sought such as Beam-on-Winkler-Springs, Bradley, et al (2011), pseudo-static method, Tabesh and Poulos (2001) and the limit equilibrium method, Dobry, et al (2003). Bradley, et al (2011), have proposed a probabilistic framework for Pseudostatic analysis of pile foundations in liquefied and lateral spreading soils. A pseudo-static method involves applying static displacements and forces to a typical beam-spring model, has been used in Monte Carlo simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematic response is one of the key issues in seismic design of pile foundations [1][2][3][4], as the dynamic response of the pile structure largely differs from the response at the free field soil caused by seismic wave. In practice, the influence of inertial loading at the pile-head level has conventionally received sufficient attention by design engineers, but not the kinematic seismic response [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Αυτό έχει ως αποτέλεσμα να χρησιμοποιείται εκτεταμένα από πολλούς ερευνητές για την εκτίμηση της τρωτότητας των γεφυρών (π.χ. Karim και Yamazaki, 1999;Karim και Yamazaki, 2001;Karim και Yamazaki, 2007;Hwang et al, 2001;Nielson και DesRoches, 2007;Padgett και DesRoches, 2009;Kwon και Elnashai, 2010;Choi et al, 2004;Bradley et al, 2011;Mackie και Stojadinovic, 2005). Τα πλεονεκτήματα αλλά και οι δυσκολίες αυτού του τύπου της ανάλυσης είναι γνωστά και δεν κρίνεται σκόπιμο να αναφερθούν στο πλαίσιο της παρούσας διατριβής.…”
Section: διεξαγωγή αριθμητικών επιλύσεωνunclassified