2004
DOI: 10.31671/dogus.2019.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Prediction of the Next Earthquake in the NAFZ (North Anatolian Fault Zone), Turkey

Abstract: Statistical methods are useful for characterizing seismic hazard because earthquakes are, for all practical purposes, random phenomena. They provide additional insights to the seismic hazard or risk problem. Seismic risk and earthquake occurrence probabilities can be estimated by using probability distributions. In this study Weibull, Log-normal, Log-logistic, Exponential and Gamma distributions have been examined for which one has the best fit for the given data. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics was used at… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of candidate statistical distributions have been proposed for computation of conditional probabilistic of future earthquakes, including the Laplace or double exponential (Utsu [5]), Gamma (Utsu [6]), Lognormal (Nishenko and Buland [7]), and Weibul (Hagiwara [8]; Rikitak [9]) distributions. Veysel Yilmaz et al [10] obtained a reasonably good fit to a Weibull distribution for earthquake data. In this paper, the earthquake data which occurred in the area coordinated 23˚ -26˚ North latitudes and 89˚ -91˚ East longitudes between 1918-2007 years and whose magnitude equals 7 or higher were used.…”
Section: S Roy 109mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of candidate statistical distributions have been proposed for computation of conditional probabilistic of future earthquakes, including the Laplace or double exponential (Utsu [5]), Gamma (Utsu [6]), Lognormal (Nishenko and Buland [7]), and Weibul (Hagiwara [8]; Rikitak [9]) distributions. Veysel Yilmaz et al [10] obtained a reasonably good fit to a Weibull distribution for earthquake data. In this paper, the earthquake data which occurred in the area coordinated 23˚ -26˚ North latitudes and 89˚ -91˚ East longitudes between 1918-2007 years and whose magnitude equals 7 or higher were used.…”
Section: S Roy 109mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…But by 2007, 10 years had elapsed since the last severe earthquake, the one in 1997. Again according to Vevsel Yilmaz et al [10], in modeling earthquake data the most appropriate distribution was established as Weibull distribution. Henceforth, to determine earthquakes risk we also consider Weibull distribution.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(d) Log-logistic distribution [Yilmaz et al 2004, Yilmaz andCelik 2008] Loglogistic distribution is a probability distribution of random variables, if logarithm of the random variable is logistically distributed. The loglogistic distribution is generally used to model events that experience an initial increase, followed by a rate decrease.…”
Section: Probability Distribution Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, several statistical distri-bution models have been proposed for forecasting of future earthquakes including double exponential [Utsu 1972b], Gaussian [Rikitake 1974], Weibull [Hagiwara 1974, Rikitake 1974, Gamma [Utsu 1984] and Lognormal [Nishenko and Buland 1987]. This type of study has been carried by many researchers for different areas Ram 1997, 1999;Yilmaz et al 2004, Yilmaz and Celik 2008, Yadav et al 2008, Sil et al 2015.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the prediction methods conducted by the scientific community to predict the recurrence time of earthquake is probabilistic analysis. It has proved to be an appropriate method to predict the recurrence time of earthquake in several seismically active zones such as in Mexico, Turkey, Teheran, Italy, Taiwan and Los Angeles [17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%