2021
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.5696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic performance validation of deep learning‐based robust NMPC controllers

Abstract: Solving nonlinear model predictive control problems in real time is still an important challenge despite of recent advances in computing hardware, optimization algorithms and tailored implementations. This challenge is even greater when uncertainty is present due to disturbances, unknown parameters or measurement and estimation errors. To enable the application of advanced control schemes to fast systems and on low-cost embedded hardware, we propose to approximate a robust nonlinear model controller using deep… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the MPC control strategy is generated, and the calibration of MPC control parameters is performed by directly learning from the data on the basis of ML. In order for the real-time response of the controller to be realized, the sample database is trained offline by using the deep neural network [66][67][68][69]. Afterwards, nondirect measurement and the state variables for MPC are designed on the basis of ML, such as reinforcement learning [70].…”
Section: Learning-based On Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the MPC control strategy is generated, and the calibration of MPC control parameters is performed by directly learning from the data on the basis of ML. In order for the real-time response of the controller to be realized, the sample database is trained offline by using the deep neural network [66][67][68][69]. Afterwards, nondirect measurement and the state variables for MPC are designed on the basis of ML, such as reinforcement learning [70].…”
Section: Learning-based On Model Predictive Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a learning-based MPC setting, recent works such as (Hertneck et al, 2018;Rosolia et al, 2018;Karg et al, 2021) discuss a few probabilistic considerations. In this paper, we bring in a novel stochastic sampling-based design for differentiable predictive control architecture along with chance constraints for closed-loop state evolution and provide appropriate probabilistic guarantees motivated from (Hertneck et al, 2018).…”
Section: Probabilistic Guaranteesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Lenz et al (2015) discussed a recurrent neural model for learning latent dynamics for MPC. In a learning-based MPC setting, various forms of probabilistic guarantees are discussed in recent works such as Hertneck et al (2018); Rosolia et al (2018); Karg et al (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed in [2], this result may be alternatively derived by applying the scenario approach with discarded constraints [8,6]. Adaptations of this result have been used in the context of chance constrained optimization [4,20], and stochastic model predictive control [17,15,19].…”
Section: Uncertainty Quantification Using Probabilistic Maximizationmentioning
confidence: 99%