2004
DOI: 10.1002/pse.180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic models for life‐cycle performance of deteriorating structures: review and future directions

Abstract: In comparison with the well‐researched field of analysis and design of structural systems, the life‐cycle performance prediction of these systems under no maintenance as well as under various maintenance scenarios is far more complex, and is a rapidly emergent field in structural engineering. As structures become older and maintenance costs become higher, different agencies and administrations in charge of civil infrastructure systems are facing challenges related to the implementation of structure maintenance… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
132
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 311 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
132
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…While this applies equally to newly built and existing structures, the problem is particularly relevant for the latter, for which the cost of increasing the reliability is generally much higher (Melchers 2001). Extensive research has been carried out on probabilistic modeling of deterioration in structural systems, as reviewed by Frangopol et al (2004). Furthermore, methods for reliability analysis of deteriorating structural systems have been developed over the past two decades, including works by Mori and Ellingwood (1993), Li (1995), Ciampoli (1998), Estes and Frangopol (1999) and Stewart and Val (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this applies equally to newly built and existing structures, the problem is particularly relevant for the latter, for which the cost of increasing the reliability is generally much higher (Melchers 2001). Extensive research has been carried out on probabilistic modeling of deterioration in structural systems, as reviewed by Frangopol et al (2004). Furthermore, methods for reliability analysis of deteriorating structural systems have been developed over the past two decades, including works by Mori and Ellingwood (1993), Li (1995), Ciampoli (1998), Estes and Frangopol (1999) and Stewart and Val (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these uncertainties, it is imperative for structural engineers to accurately model and assess the structural performance and expected total cost within a probabilistic life-cycle context (Frangopol 2011).Furthermore, the effects of maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation on structural lifecycle performance must be quantified (Barone &Frangopol 2014b, Frangopol et al 2004, Sánchez-Silva et al 2016, Zhu & Frangopol 2012, 2013. Approaches for the life-cycle management of infrastructure systems involving reliability performance indicators consider uncertainties associated with loads and resistance, but are not able to account for the consequences incurred from structural failure.…”
Section: Risk and Sustainability In A Life-cycle Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The past two decades have seen considerable research on time-dependent reliability of deteriorating structures (e.g., Mori and Ellingwood 1993;Frangopol, et al 2004). To model the life-cycle of a facility, including time to failure under random occurrences of loads or number of loads until failure occurs (e.g., operational and extreme loads), stochastic models of the deterioration processes and the dependencies between these processes will be included in NIST-CORE.…”
Section: Treatment Of Interdependency Aging Infrastructure and Uncementioning
confidence: 99%