2006
DOI: 10.1007/11796435_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Modelling and Evaluation of Soft Real-Time Embedded Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume some distribution of likelihood in this interval, say a normal distribution, we could vary the cost of executing that function by passing a random value taken from this interval, instead of the worst-case value, whenever we ask the resources to schedule our task (in line 11 in Figure 2.27). This approach was studied by Florescu and De Hoon in [ 36]. Of course, it requires even more repetitions for the simulations than in the previous case, for example because the hyper-period limitation per simulation run is not longer viable since the model is no longer deterministic.…”
Section: Design Question 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If we assume some distribution of likelihood in this interval, say a normal distribution, we could vary the cost of executing that function by passing a random value taken from this interval, instead of the worst-case value, whenever we ask the resources to schedule our task (in line 11 in Figure 2.27). This approach was studied by Florescu and De Hoon in [ 36]. Of course, it requires even more repetitions for the simulations than in the previous case, for example because the hyper-period limitation per simulation run is not longer viable since the model is no longer deterministic.…”
Section: Design Question 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we know that this worst-case response time might not have been reached yet because we did not simulate long enough. The approach proposed in [ 36] is to approximate the histogram by some Gaussian distribution. From this distribution, we can calculate, using standard mathematics, the likelihood that the application would exceed the worst-case timing requirement.…”
Section: Design Question 2 Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the execution of application tasks is determined at run-time, the designer computes a realistic worst-case execution bound for the overall application that guarantees that all deadlines will be met. Both the application and architecture must allow the computation of such bounds, for instance by providing (statistical) upper bounds on dynamic behavior [47]. Considering Eclipse's flexibility requirements and the dynamic nature of the targeted media applications, designing Eclipse for worst case is not cost-effective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%