Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2009
DOI: 10.1145/1645953.1646050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic latent preference analysis for collaborative filtering

Abstract: A central goal of collaborative filtering (CF) is to rank items by their utilities with respect to individual users in order to make personalized recommendations. Traditionally, this is often formulated as a rating prediction problem. However, it is more desirable for CF algorithms to address the ranking problem directly without going through an extra rating prediction step. In this paper, we propose the probabilistic latent preference analysis (pLPA) model for ranking predictions by directly modeling user pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
78
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CF techniques are divided into two categories: memorybased [23,4] and model-based [17,9]. Memory-based algorithms are heuristics to recommend by aggregating the preference of similar users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CF techniques are divided into two categories: memorybased [23,4] and model-based [17,9]. Memory-based algorithms are heuristics to recommend by aggregating the preference of similar users.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[29] also uses a nuclear norm regularization, but that work assumes access to the true underlying ratings, while we assume access only to pairwise preferences. Other algorithms aggregate users ratings by exploiting the similarity of users by nearest neighbor search [5,28], low-rank matrix factorization [22,23,29], or probabilistic latent model [10,16]. However, as noted, numeric ratings can be highly varied even when preferences are shared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However to get a complete picture the method should also be compared to other latent factor pairwise preferences elicitation methods. [1], [9], [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%