1995
DOI: 10.1109/69.469827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic knowledge bases

Abstract: We define a new fixpoint semantics for rule-based reasoning in the presence of weighted information. The semantics is illustrated on a real-world application requiring such reasoning. Optimizations and approximations of the semantics are shown so as to make the semantics amenable to very large scale real-world applications. We finally prove that the semantics is probabilistic and reduces to the usual fixpoint semantics of stratified Datalog if all information is certain. We implemented various knowledge discov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. From the weights and the closing values of the training data, probabilistic rules are generated Wtithrich (1995), Wtithrich (1997). 4.…”
Section: Prediction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. From the weights and the closing values of the training data, probabilistic rules are generated Wtithrich (1995), Wtithrich (1997). 4.…”
Section: Prediction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wuthrich et al [24] develop an online system for predicting the opening prices of five stock indices, where by combining the weights of the keywords from news articles and the historical closing prices of a particular index, some probabilistic rules are generated using the approach proposed in [25]. Laverenko et al [26] propose a system for predicting the intra day stock price movements by analyzing the contents of the real-time news articles based on a language modeling approach, which is in turn proposed in [26].…”
Section: ê ð ø ûóömentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wüthrich [Wüt95] elaborates on their work, taking into account partial dependencies between clauses. For example, if each of atoms a, b and c has a prior probability of 0.5 and we have two rules p ← a∧b and p ← b∧c, Kiefer and Li will assume the rules independent and assign a probability 0.25 + 0.25 − 0.25 * 0.25 = 0.4375 to p. Wüthrich's system, however, takes into account the fact that b is shared by the clauses and computes instead 0.25 + 0.25 − 0.5 3 = 0.375 (that is, it avoids double counting of the case where the two rules fire at the same time, which occurs only when the three atoms are true at once).…”
Section: Extensional Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%