2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Investigation and Risk Assessment of Debris Transport in Extreme Hydrodynamic Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stolle et al (2018b), in a hydrodynamic analysis of the same flume, determined that the approximate Darcy-Weisbach friction factor was 0.0293 by fitting the instantaneous wave profile of various impoundment depths to the Chanson (2006) solution for a dam-break wave. The coefficient of static friction ( 0 ) between the debris model and the false floor was approximately 0.40 (Stolle et al 2018c), which slightly exceeds the suggested coefficient (0.30) used in the design of shipping container transportation methods (GDV 2003).…”
Section: Methodology 21 Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stolle et al (2018b), in a hydrodynamic analysis of the same flume, determined that the approximate Darcy-Weisbach friction factor was 0.0293 by fitting the instantaneous wave profile of various impoundment depths to the Chanson (2006) solution for a dam-break wave. The coefficient of static friction ( 0 ) between the debris model and the false floor was approximately 0.40 (Stolle et al 2018c), which slightly exceeds the suggested coefficient (0.30) used in the design of shipping container transportation methods (GDV 2003).…”
Section: Methodology 21 Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The experiments were performed within the context of a larger experimental protocol examining debris impact forces on a structure (Derschum et al 2018, Stolle et al 2018a, 2018c, 2019. The structure (0.20 m × 0.20 m × 0.80 m) was placed at a distance of 7.03 m from the gate.…”
Section: Methodology 21 Experimental Facilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors chose to install the debris at a distance of 1 m (model scale) from the building. Although this distance was shown by Stolle et al (2018c) to be enough to guarantee full acceleration of the shipping containers, this might have affected their trajectory (Nistor et al 2016), thus influencing the formation of the debris dam and hydrodynamic forces exerted on the building.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debris was inserted in the middle of the channel at a distance of 1 m upstream from the building, over a width of 0.30 to 0.40 m (Figure 1). Stolle et al (2018c) showed that a distance of 0.75 m was sufficient to guarantee full acceleration of containers with comparable size and similar flow conditions. Naito et al (2013) and θ = ±11.7° for 10 containers (minimum value allocated during Test 1).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation