The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.3390/infrastructures4030044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Identification of Seismic Response Mechanism in a Class of Similar Arch Dams

Abstract: Different numerical models have been proposed for seismic analysis of concrete dams by taking into account the nonlinear behavior of concrete and joints; interaction between the dam, foundation, and reservoir; and other seismic hazard considerations. Less focus, however, has been placed on the real seismic performance of the dams and their relative correlation. This paper investigates the linear and nonlinear seismic performance of two similar high arch dams with relatively different response mechanisms. The r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…OBE level seismic forces are known as unusual loads, whereas MDE and MCE seismic forces are regarded as extreme loads. Seismic earthquake loads must be unified with multiple loads for design purposes expected to be available during routine operations [2][3][4][5]. The damage starts from the heel within the gravity dam's body and then extends over the dam's upstream material and progresses to its downstream face [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OBE level seismic forces are known as unusual loads, whereas MDE and MCE seismic forces are regarded as extreme loads. Seismic earthquake loads must be unified with multiple loads for design purposes expected to be available during routine operations [2][3][4][5]. The damage starts from the heel within the gravity dam's body and then extends over the dam's upstream material and progresses to its downstream face [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters of an elastic-damage interface model are also identified by Corigliano et al [55,56] where the extended Kalman filter method is applied. Further, Ebrahimian et al and Hariri-Ardebili et al [57][58][59][60][61][62] investigated the damage parameter identification in the framework of structural health monitoring by using an extended version of Kalman filter. Damage detection for the purpose of health monitoring is also done by Yan et al [63] by using the Kalman filter and other stochastic approaches by Kourehli et al and Gharehbaghi et al [64][65][66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also Sevieri et al [44][45][46] investigated the parameter identification of structural models in the framework of structural health monitoring and Marsili et al [47][48][49][50][51] investigated the update of a finite element model using functional approximation of the system response. Further, Hariri-Ardebili et al [52][53][54] and Pouraminian et al [55][56][57] studied the finite element updating of mechanical models and reliability analysis for the concrete structures by using the functional approximation. Also Kourehli et al and Gharehbaghi et al [58][59][60] employed stochastic approaches for this purpose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%