OFC/NFOEC Technical Digest. Optical Fiber Communication Conference, 2005. 2005
DOI: 10.1109/ofc.2005.192560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic graphical models for resilience of all-optical networks under crosstalk attacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The graph is also known as a Random-Bond model [19], where dipoles are connected by random bonds which depend on node positions. The two-layer MRF (σ, X) can also be represented by a chain graph [21] of two MRF layers, one for X and the other for σ. The two-layer probabilistic graph thus maps the complex spatial dependence of a multihop wireless network to an explicit graphical representation.…”
Section: Two-layer Markov Random Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The graph is also known as a Random-Bond model [19], where dipoles are connected by random bonds which depend on node positions. The two-layer MRF (σ, X) can also be represented by a chain graph [21] of two MRF layers, one for X and the other for σ. The two-layer probabilistic graph thus maps the complex spatial dependence of a multihop wireless network to an explicit graphical representation.…”
Section: Two-layer Markov Random Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For clarity, we summarize the asymptotic results on M f sd in (19) and (20) for network resilience under various topologies in Table I. Assume that there is one link-shortest route between each pair of nodes in the network.…”
Section: B Impact Of Physical Topology On Network Resilience Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The network resilience loss M f sd does not always increase with ρ for arbitrary network with arbitrary route. For a counterexample, please refer to [19]. However, when practical route sets are considered, M f sd increases with ρ for several typical network topologies.…”
Section: A Impact Of Network Load On Network Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it suffices to focus on ( : ) propagation at the physical layer, where the values of ' i s are determined by physical layer parameters such as: nodal loss ratios, amplifier gain characteristics, and fiber attenuation ratios (see [5] for details). In the rest of the paper, we assume that …”
Section: A Physical-layer Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sd f Then the crosstalk attack may propagate along route sd r . Denote the signal power of flow sd f in the switching plane of node i V as a random variable , 1,2,... .i U i k The attenuation of the attacker's jamming power within the network can be captured using deterministic functions that depend on the characteristics of optical devices at the physical layer[5].Let the status of nodei V be a random variable i X , where 1 i Xif the level of crosstalk incurred by normal flows from the attacker's flow at the switching plane of node i V exceeds the threshold for a Quality of Service (QoS) constraint…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%