2005
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2005.147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic finite-state machines - part I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
131
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
131
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A Pfa is a generative device for which there are a number of possible definitions 305 (Paz, 1971;Vidal et al, 2005).…”
Section: Building a Probabilistic Automatonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Pfa is a generative device for which there are a number of possible definitions 305 (Paz, 1971;Vidal et al, 2005).…”
Section: Building a Probabilistic Automatonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the purposes of analysis we use probabilistic deterministic finite automata (PDFA) [9], which have the bare minimum needed to represent distributions generated by business processes. A PDFA is a five-tuple A = (Q A , Σ, δ A , q 0 , q F ), where Q A is finite set of states including single start and end states q 0 , q F ; Σ is an alphabet of symbols; and δ A : Q A × Σ × Q A → [0, 1] defines the probability function governing transition between states.…”
Section: Processes As Distributions Over Strings Of Symbolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basically, a cfset C is not a dpfa [11] over Z * since F (p) + (b|a)∈Z,q∈Q T (p, (b|a), q) = 1 in general. However, by using Constraints (1) and (2), we can show that for every fixed input string x ∈ X * , P (y|C, x) = z∈L(x,y) P (z|C) defines a distribution over Y * : y∈Y * P (y|C, x) = 1, that is the reason why we speak of conditional fsets.…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is now clear that if we want P to generate a distribution over Y * , then P must be a pfa [11], i.e., for every state, the probability of the outgoing transitions plus the probability of this state to be final must be 1. This is exactly the statements of Constraints (1) and (2).…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%