2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic fatigue assessment for railway axles and derivation of a simple format for damage calculations

Abstract: This paper describes a procedure for the determination of railway axle risk of fatigue failure under service loading for a simple fatigue assessment compliant to modern structural recommendations.\ud After an initial review of reliability assessment under fatigue, a fully probabilistic approach is outlined, whose input data for the fatigue damage obtained with the EURAXLES project are briefly summarised. Then, a series of Montecarlo simulations was carried out in order to determine the maximum allowable stress… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a further validation of the proposed probabilistic control volume method, it is used to predict the fatigue strength of the full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature. Figure 10 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data for the small specimen in literature [24], in which a = −0.0487, B = 2.572 and N 0 = 1.66 × 10 6 . It is seen that, the predicted 50% survival probability curve is generally in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and most of the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord well with the experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Data Of Full Scale Axlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a further validation of the proposed probabilistic control volume method, it is used to predict the fatigue strength of the full scale EA4T axles by using the fatigue strength data tested for small specimens in literature. Figure 10 shows a comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data for the small specimen in literature [24], in which a = −0.0487, B = 2.572 and N 0 = 1.66 × 10 6 . It is seen that, the predicted 50% survival probability curve is generally in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and most of the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord well with the experimental data.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Data Of Full Scale Axlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is seen that, the predicted 50% survival probability curve is generally in the middle of the scattered experimental data, and most of the experimental data are within the predicted 95% and 5% survival probability curves, indicating that the predicted P-S-N curves accord well with the experimental data. Figure 11 shows the comparison of the predicted P-S-N curves with the experimental data of the full scale EA4T axles [24] by using the fatigue strength data of the small specimen [24]. Here, the control surface is considered, which is 9656.84 mm 2 for the full scale axle and 227.85 mm 2 for the small specimen.…”
Section: Comparison With Experimental Data Of Full Scale Axlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the tests performed in Euraxles on EA1N, a set of parameters is finally defined in the project and is recommended for such a steel grade. * The proposed method is finally quite similar to the one proposed by Beretta which is based on the Eurocode recommendations [21]. The main difference lays on the consideration of the load spectra variability: Beretta's proposal is based on a representative load spectrum, with a given and fixed shape, to which an assumed scatter (the same for all load classes) is associated, while in the approach presented in this paper, the load spectra can have different shapes, depending on the load historical signals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Various New tests, performed in the research project Euraxles on small scale specimen, in constant and variable amplitudes configurations, led to a new set of parameters, agreed to be the reference final set in the project Euraxles [21,22].…”
Section: Fatigue Reliability Assessment Of a Railway Passenger Coach mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beretta and Regazzi [2] developed a probabilistic extension to the standard railway axle calculation method which computes failure probability utilizing Monte Carlo simulations considering the position of the S-N curve and the load spectrum as random variables. Kim et al [3] analyzed multiple crack growth with the NASGRO model and XFEM simulations considering the variability of initial crack length, material parameters and crack growth rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%