2000
DOI: 10.15760/etd.1224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Determination of Failure Load Capacity Variations for Lattice Type Structures Based on Yield Strength Variations including Nonlinear Post-Buckling Member Performance

Abstract: I deeply appreciate the unique environment my country of Germany, my state of Bavaria, and my village Wenighosbach provided me with to become the person I am. My deepest gratitude is extended to my parents, brothers, and friends for their love, support and encouragement during the long and challenging path I decided to take.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [28] a large number of steels were examined and it was shown that their yield strength depends on their grade (1.12-1.28 for S355), while their coefficient of variation is equal to 0.05-0.07 with normal distribution. Similar conclusions for the yield strength were drawn from other researchers [29][30][31], while it was shown [32][33][34] that the coefficient of variation of the Young modulus is quite small and is usually treated deterministically. Steel sections are industrial products and the variability in their dimensions is minimal.…”
Section: Normalsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In [28] a large number of steels were examined and it was shown that their yield strength depends on their grade (1.12-1.28 for S355), while their coefficient of variation is equal to 0.05-0.07 with normal distribution. Similar conclusions for the yield strength were drawn from other researchers [29][30][31], while it was shown [32][33][34] that the coefficient of variation of the Young modulus is quite small and is usually treated deterministically. Steel sections are industrial products and the variability in their dimensions is minimal.…”
Section: Normalsupporting
confidence: 85%