2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic collapse analysis of degrading Multi Degree of Freedom structures under earthquake excitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of concept system is modelled as a single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure using an elastic-plastic bilinear hysteric model, and analyses cases with and without initial or prior stiffness degradation. Such a bilinear model has been widely used to represent the basic inelastic system with P-delta effect [2,6,17,28,29], where the yielding displacement dy divides the response into an elastic segment and a plastic segment as shown in Figure 1. The HLA SHM method [25] is used to determine the current damaged or undamaged structural parameters of the system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proof of concept system is modelled as a single degree of freedom (SDOF) structure using an elastic-plastic bilinear hysteric model, and analyses cases with and without initial or prior stiffness degradation. Such a bilinear model has been widely used to represent the basic inelastic system with P-delta effect [2,6,17,28,29], where the yielding displacement dy divides the response into an elastic segment and a plastic segment as shown in Figure 1. The HLA SHM method [25] is used to determine the current damaged or undamaged structural parameters of the system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach was used by several researchers in the literature (e.g. [14,26]) and proved to give precise results.…”
Section: Incremental Dynamic Analysis Target Performance Levels and mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fundamental mode of vibration [ [12][13][14] as well as to bridges [15]. For specific details of the records including earthquake names, sensor location, magnitude, distance, soil type, faulting mechanism, and peak waveform ordinates, one may be referred to [12].…”
Section: Building Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 A number of studies utilise frames that have been designed to specific seismic code requirements or design methodologies. A small number of recent studies have investigated the effect of degradation on the inelastic response of buildings using cyclic constitutive models developed for reinforced concrete [21][22][23] or steel models adapted to very specific types of moment connections. It was shown that the salient parameters that influence the global and the inter-storey drifts are the ratio of the fundamental period of the frames to the mean period of the ground motion, as well as the level of inelasticity-expressed through the "actual" behaviour factor of the frames.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of most investigations with SDOF systems, the steel frame models used in existing studies are non-deteriorating, mainly for the sake of simplicity and computational efficiency. A small number of recent studies have investigated the effect of degradation on the inelastic response of buildings using cyclic constitutive models developed for reinforced concrete [21][22][23] or steel models adapted to very specific types of moment connections. [24][25][26][27][28] The development of relatively simple hysteretic constitutive models that enable the modelling of deterioration in the strength and stiffness of components of steel structures 14 and the availability of empirical relationships for the calibration of the critical modelling parameters that affect the cyclic moment-rotation relationship at plastic hinge regions, on the basis of information from experimental data, 29 provide the means for investigating the inelastic displacement response of multi-storey steel frames with deteriorating components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%