2002
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2002)128:10(1024)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Capacity Models and Fragility Estimates for Reinforced Concrete Columns based on Experimental Observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
266
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 570 publications
(283 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
266
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Selecting an appropriate pair of IM and DM is a difficult task, as the PSDM results are practically sufficient and efficient (Gardoni et al 2002(Gardoni et al , 2003. In the current study, response history analyses (RHAs) are used to quantify the seismic demand of the reference structures.…”
Section: Probabilistic Demand Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting an appropriate pair of IM and DM is a difficult task, as the PSDM results are practically sufficient and efficient (Gardoni et al 2002(Gardoni et al , 2003. In the current study, response history analyses (RHAs) are used to quantify the seismic demand of the reference structures.…”
Section: Probabilistic Demand Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is the development of linear models by Bayesian inference, as described by Box and Tiao [31]. Gardoni et al [32] applied this approach to reinforced concrete members in the context of seismic risk. This approach is appealing because the resulting models meet the conditions required for use in a relia- bility analysis.…”
Section: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models in Eqs. (2) and (3) originally included damping and overstrength as regressors, but they were omitted in a stepwise modeling process as described by Gardoni et al [32]. The parameter v in the response model is a decision variable that indicates the amount of increase in the lateral strength of the building as a result of seismic retro t. This parameter will later be employed to prioritize buildings in a portfolio for retro t actions.…”
Section: Building Response Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graphical representations of seismic fragility as functions of vector intensity measures are called fragility surfaces. They provide the same information as fragility curves, that is, probabilities of exceedance of limiting engineering design parameters, but are calculated as functions of two-dimensional vector-valued intensity measures (Gardoni et al 2002). For example, fragility surfaces have been constructed as functions of the absolute maxima of the ground-motion metrics, such as peak ground-acceleration, velocity or displacement (Seyedi et al 2009;Gehl et al 2013); spectral ordinates at distinct structural periods (Gehl et al 2011); or structure-specific parameters such as imposed drift and aspect ratio (Yazdi et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%