Probabilistic Assessment of Investment Options in Honey Value Chains in Lamu County, Kenya

Abstract

Designing and implementing biodiversity-based value chains can be a complex undertaking, especially in places where outcomes are uncertain and risks of project failure and cost overruns are high. We used the Stochastic Impact Evaluation (SIE) approach to guide the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) on viable investment options in honey value chains, which the agency considered implementing as an economic incentive for communities along the Kenya-Somalia border to conserve biodiversity. The SIE approach allows for holistic analysis of project cost, benefit, and risk variables, including those with uncertain and missing information. It also identifies areas that pose critical uncertainties in the project. We started by conducting a baseline survey in Witu and Awer in Lamu County, Kenya. The aim of the survey was to establish the current farm income from beekeeping as a baseline, against which the prospective impacts of intervention options could be measured. We then developed an intervention decision model that was populated with all cost, benefit and risk variables relevant to beekeeping. After receiving training in making quantitative estimates, four subject-matter experts expressed their uncertainty about the proposed variables in the model by specifying probability distributions for them. We then used Monte Carlo simulation to project decision outcomes. We also identified variables that projected decision outcomes were most sensitive to, and we determined the value of information for each variable. The variable with the highest information value to the decision-maker in Witu was the honey price. In Awer, no additional information on any of the variables would change the recommendation to invest in honey value chains in the region. The analysis demonstrates a novel and comprehensive approach to decision-making for different stakeholders in a project where decision outcomes are uncertain.

Is investment in Climate-Smart-agricultural practices the option for the future? Cost and benefit analysis evidence from Ghana

“…By so doing, the model was able to capture the large degree of uncertainty associated with the true value of the variables. The @Risk was used to perform risks analysis using Monte Carlo simulation to provide many possible outcomes of our model and inform our result of the likelihood and risks associated with any given outcome ( Wafula et al., 2018 ). This enabled us to judge which risk is worth taking thus allowing for the best decision under uncertainty.…”

Data for the evaluation of irrigation development interventions in Northern Ethiopia

“…We used an expert knowledge elicitation approach, which is also used in other studies [4], [5], [6], to collect estimates for model variables. All experts were familiarized with estimation techniques to overcome bias, allowing them to provide quantitative estimates in the form of distributions representing their subjective 90% confidence intervals [7]. Initial monetary estimates were collected in Ethiopian currency (i.e.…”

Improving development efficiency through decision analysis: Reservoir protection in Burkina Faso

“…This decision analysis approach, which has been widely used in business decision support and a number of other contexts (e.g. Luedeling et al, 2015;Wafula et al, 2018), employs participatory processes to explore in detail the consequences of a particular decision. Rather than aiming to precisely predict results for all available D. Lanzanova, et al Environmental Modelling and Software 115 (2019) 164-175 decision options, which is usually impossible for even moderately complex systems, AIE attempts to capture the state of knowledge on all processes and input variables, e.g.…”

“…Decision analysis typically reveals that the decision recommendation can only be influenced by a very small number of uncertain variables, with many others affecting the projected NPV, but not its sign (e.g. Wafula et al, 2018). This, however, is the only important criterion to a decision-maker choosing the optimal option.…”

“…Smoothing is necessary at this stage to separate the signal emerging from the variable under scrutiny from the substantial noise caused by variation in all other variables, which vary randomly within the Monte Carlo simulation. The EVPI was then calculated as the sum of all outputs with a sign that did not correspond to the sign of the expected value, multiplied by the probability assigned to this outcome (Wafula et al, 2018).…”