2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Probabilistic Approach to Predicting Substrate Specificity of Methyltransferases

Abstract: We present a general probabilistic framework for predicting the substrate specificity of enzymes. We designed this approach to be easily applicable to different organisms and enzymes. Therefore, our predictive models do not rely on species-specific properties and use mostly sequence-derived data. Maximum Likelihood optimization is used to fine-tune model parameters and the Akaike Information Criterion is employed to overcome the issue of correlated variables. As a proof-of-principle, we apply our approach to p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To fully understand why the elongation factors are methylated, it is essential to uncover these enzymes. Recent work has been done to predict substrate category (protein versus nucleotide versus small molecule) and has correctly predicted Efm3 as a protein methyltransferase (53). However, the specifics of residue type and extent of modification are a much more complex question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To fully understand why the elongation factors are methylated, it is essential to uncover these enzymes. Recent work has been done to predict substrate category (protein versus nucleotide versus small molecule) and has correctly predicted Efm3 as a protein methyltransferase (53). However, the specifics of residue type and extent of modification are a much more complex question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, 86 known and putative methyltransferases have been identified, with 16 having no known substrates (36,55); of these latter enzymes, six are predicted to have protein substrates (53). Additionally, 40 yeast methyltransferases have human homologs, suggesting that the modifications may be important for a properly functioning cell (56).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trypsinized eEF1A from knockouts of the putative protein methyltransferases YLR285W, YGR001C, YNL024C, and YNL092W (32) only revealed a loss of N-terminal Gly 2 and Lys 3 methylation in ⌬YLR285W (Supplemental Fig. S3).…”
Section: Ylr285w Is the Methyltransferase Responsible For N-terminal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these enzymes fall into three major classes based on their structural folds and binding mechanism of the methyl donor, S -adenosylmethionine (AdoMet): seven-beta-strand (Class I), SET domain, and SPOUT methyltransferases. The majority of SPOUT methyltransferases modify RNA [9,10,11]. The SET domain methyltransferases, such as elongation factor methyltransferase 1 (Efm1), are classical protein lysine modifiers [12,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%