2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive/Reactive Focus on Form and Immediate/Delayed Writing Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of the study indicated that focus on form helped the learners in the treatment group produce a significantly higher frequency of accurate simple past tense and past perfect tense than the control group. The first finding of the study was further supported by Bakshiri and Mohammadi (2014) who found that proactive focus on form were more effective than reactive focus on form in improving the grammar of Iranian EFL learners. The findings of Gezmiş's (2011) study bore a resemblance to the findings of the current study in that in both studies the effectiveness of planned focus on form was measured and it was found to be more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of the study indicated that focus on form helped the learners in the treatment group produce a significantly higher frequency of accurate simple past tense and past perfect tense than the control group. The first finding of the study was further supported by Bakshiri and Mohammadi (2014) who found that proactive focus on form were more effective than reactive focus on form in improving the grammar of Iranian EFL learners. The findings of Gezmiş's (2011) study bore a resemblance to the findings of the current study in that in both studies the effectiveness of planned focus on form was measured and it was found to be more effective.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The findings from the progress achievement test are parallel with the following research findings in the SLA literature related to focus on form. The studies which were carried out in different parts of the world indicated that the learners who received focus on form were superior to the learners who did not receive focus on form (Lyster, 2004;Othman & Ismail, 2008;Gezmiş, 2011;Elgün-Gündüz, Akcan, & Bayyurt, 2012;Bakshiri & Mohammadi, 2014;Nourdad & Aghayı, 2014). Lyster's (2004) study revealed that form focused instruction was effective in immersion classrooms in which the instruction provided learners balanced opportunities for noticing, language awareness and controlled practice with feedback rather than instruction that overemphasized negotiation of meaning in oral tasks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods, techniques or strategies have been proposed, used and investigated such as inductive vs. deductive methods, explicit vs implicit teaching of grammatical patterns, form-focused instruction vs. forms-focused instruction, proactive vs. reactive focus on form, in separate (isolated) activities or within the context of communicative activities (integrated). The results implied that all strategies can be beneficial, depending on the language feature to be learned, as well as characteristics of the learner, the learning conditions and perception (Agustien, 2016;Bakshiri & Mohammadi, 2014;Marzban & Mokhberi, 2012;Sik, 2015;Spada & Lightbown, 2008). The present study offered strategies in teaching passive voice and explanations about how to deal with some possible problems in teaching this problematic topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, further research could be done to identify which teaching methods are both effective and manageable. Although the proactive teaching of formal grammar has been found to be effective (Bakshiri & Mohammadi, 2014), proactively teaching the technical aspects of metadiscourse may seem timeconsuming and intimidating to practicing English teachers. Considering that the present results suggest that upper secondary pupils seem capable of adjusting their use of metadiscourse to suit the target genre, engaging pupils in analysing textual features and writing across a range of genres may be a more viable option in order to prepare them for the various tertiary and professional discourse communities that await them (Hirvela, 2004;Hyland, 2007b;Kuteeva, 2013;.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies that have compared proactive and reactive approaches to grammar teaching have tended to report that proactive ones are more successful (Bakshiri & Mohammadi, 2014). Further research could also investigate whether proactive approaches are more effective for teaching metadiscourse.…”
Section: Implications For English Writing Instructionmentioning
confidence: 99%