2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive planning for catastrophic events in supply chains

Abstract: Supply chains are increasingly vulnerable to catastrophic events such as hurricanes or terrorist attacks. This is not only true because firms are more exposed to catastrophes, but also the result of investments made in recent years to operate supply chains with fewer human and capital resources, especially inventory. Consequently, there is today less “slack” available in supply chains to deal with catastrophic events. Thus, proactively planning for these types of events should be a priority for supply chain ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
310
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 433 publications
(343 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
310
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…SCRM frameworks suggest categorising strategies by different dimensions, including redundancy vs. flexibility (Chang et al 2015;Kleindorfer and Saad, 2005;); reducing vs. coping (Ghadge et al 2012;Knemeyer et al 2009;Simangunsong et al 2012), such as sharing and transferring (Ghadge et al 2013); monitoring vs. collaboration (Hajmohammad and Vachon 2016); and depending on what risks they are to handle (Chopra and Sodhi, 2004;Ghadge et al 2013;Ho et. al 2015;Lavastre et.…”
Section: "Where Is the Crisis Management Component Of [Humanitarian Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SCRM frameworks suggest categorising strategies by different dimensions, including redundancy vs. flexibility (Chang et al 2015;Kleindorfer and Saad, 2005;); reducing vs. coping (Ghadge et al 2012;Knemeyer et al 2009;Simangunsong et al 2012), such as sharing and transferring (Ghadge et al 2013); monitoring vs. collaboration (Hajmohammad and Vachon 2016); and depending on what risks they are to handle (Chopra and Sodhi, 2004;Ghadge et al 2013;Ho et. al 2015;Lavastre et.…”
Section: "Where Is the Crisis Management Component Of [Humanitarian Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Prater et al, 2001;Van Der Vorst and Beulens, 2002;Simchi-Levi, 2010;Porter and Kramer, 2011) Geopolitical Issues Geopolitical factors can generally be classified as governmental, natural and societal disruptions. (Prater et al, 2001;Chopra and Sodhi, 2004;Christopher and Peck, 2004;Bhatnagar and Sohal, 2005;Hendricks and Singhal, 2005;Jüttner, 2005;Peck, 2005;Chan et al, 2008;Knemeyer et al, 2009;Ellis et al, 2011) Accessibility of logistics Availability and quality of land, sea and air freight services. (Prater et al, 2001;Peck, 2005;Wu et al, 2007;Simangunsong et al, 2012) Infrastructure Availability and reliability of land, power, transport and telecoms infrastructure.…”
Section: Control Disturbancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, it is important to communicate customer needs back up the supply chain so that every supply chain entity can adapt processes accordingly and create the best possible added-value product for the customer [143]. At the same time, it is important to ensure two-way communication, which means each supply chain entity proactively communicates with other supply chain partners both up and down the supply chain, to ensure feedback, information and knowledge is shared effectively [144]. According to Parody et al [138], communication can be evaluated by looking at the following five characteristics.…”
Section: Communication/information Sharing Between Supply Chain Entitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%