2020 IEEE Power &Amp; Energy Society Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference (ISGT) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/isgt45199.2020.9087788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive Islanding of the Power Grid to Mitigate High-Impact Low-Frequency Events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective function in (ODNP-3) is the sample-based estimator of the objective in (ODNP-2) designed to maximize average load served across considered scenarios. Constraint (18) fixes bus consumptions at zero when constraint (14b) is not satisfied. This motivates the optimal solution for the ODNP to be one that also increases 1 T z, lower bounded by…”
Section: G Sample Average Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The objective function in (ODNP-3) is the sample-based estimator of the objective in (ODNP-2) designed to maximize average load served across considered scenarios. Constraint (18) fixes bus consumptions at zero when constraint (14b) is not satisfied. This motivates the optimal solution for the ODNP to be one that also increases 1 T z, lower bounded by…”
Section: G Sample Average Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since distribution networks are only served by a limited number of switching devices at present, implementing these suggestions may be difficult in practice. A method for determining self-sufficient islands in transmission networks is described in [18], but cannot be directly extended to ODNP without including distribution system specific constraints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the lower limit is violated (as indicated by z e i,k = 0 in (7)), the limits remain unchanged; otherwise, minimum and maximum operating limits of the generators (P min, * i , P max, * i ) are updated using ( 8)- (9).…”
Section: B Power System Operation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the emergency warning and caution (EWAC) direction is received from various stakeholders, operators typically aim to predict outage risks to take necessary control measures to minimize loss of loads, and systems will move to resiliency mode. Techniques, such as Markovian model-based proactive sequential re-dispatch of generators [8], proactive splitting the transmission grid into islands [9], [10], transmission system reconfiguration [11], the coordinated control of multiple microgrids connected via transmission system [12], [13], defensive islanding formation [14], optimal power shut-offs [15], transmission line derating [2], [16], are common approaches for resilient transmission network operation and control. Abundant monitoring data from SCADA and PMUs can be leveraged in outage forecasting, which can be utilized for proactive resource allocation and deployment of necessary measures to serve consumers during emergency conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such assessments are useful to system planners aiming to make decisions about infrastructure development and to operators while handling emergency system conditions. A common drawback of this simulation-based approach is that it requires detailed information regarding the power network and associated components, such as locations and capacities of generation, load demands, and line parameters ( 12 15 ). Furthermore, since the majority of grid infrastructure advancements are being done at the low-voltage (LV) distribution level, a high-resolution analysis of the power distribution systems is important.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%