1981
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.7.6.480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Proactive interference effects with television news items: Further evidence.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect had previously been noticed to occur in the context of memory for televised news (e.g. Gunter et al, 1980Gunter et al, , 1981. No support was found for such an effect in the current research.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…This effect had previously been noticed to occur in the context of memory for televised news (e.g. Gunter et al, 1980Gunter et al, , 1981. No support was found for such an effect in the current research.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Evidence of format-dependent PI build-up and release has only previously been reported by Gunter et al (1981), and was of a rather tentative nature. If these effects result from processes on the input side, they may be related to Taylor and Thompson's (1 982) suggestion that vivid information is recalled better than pallid information, and that a mixture of vivid and pallid material evokes enhanced attention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…One is build-up of proactive interference (PI) with unvaried visual format. Gunter, Berry and Clifford (1981), using a PI build-up-and-release paradigm (Wickens, 1970), found evidence of release in changing from pictures to 'talking head' format. A PI interpretation is encouraged by Gunter's (1980) evidence of enhanced learning from 'talking head' lead-ins when picture sequences were interspersed in the body of the reports.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turvey and Egan (1970) changed two dimensions at the same time and found performance on trial 4 was equal to performance on trial 1, regardless of whether the retention interval was 5 or 15 sec. Gunter et al (1981) have demonstrated release from PI when testing subjects' memory for news items taped off the evening news. The news stories were classified as being either domestic or international, and recall was always better following a change in type.…”
Section: Dlstra 9 Intervalmentioning
confidence: 99%