“…Cognitive mapping benefits from the integration and generalization of memories as is central to schema theory, but in other fields of memory research, a dominant theme for how overlapping memories interact is representational interference. This has been widely observed in perceptual, procedural, semantic, and episodic memory systems (Craig, Dewar, & Sala, 2015;Neath & Surprenant, 2015), and minimizing such interference in declarative memory encoding and retrieval is perhaps a primary function of the hippocampus (e.g., Brown, Ross, Keller, Hasselmo, & Stern, 2010;Chanales et al, 2017;Lacy, Yassa, Stark, Muftuler, & Stark, 2011;LaRocque et al, 2013;Wood, Dudchenko, Robitsek, & Eichenbaum, 2000). As highlighted in Section 1.2, a core component of the nonspatial schema literature has been the observation that greater relational integration with a schema is a double-edged sword-increasing a loss of episodic detail and interference and confusability between memories for distinct experiences (indeed, damage to the neural circuitry associated with schema memory has been shown to protect the individual from episodic memory errors, see van Kesteren & Brown, 2014;Warren, Jones, Duff, & Tranel, 2014).…”