2022
DOI: 10.1080/19490976.2022.2035660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pro-mutagenic effects of the gut microbiota in a Lynch syndrome mouse model

Abstract: The gut microbiota strongly impacts the development of sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC), but it is largely unknown how the microbiota affects the pathogenesis of mismatch-repair-deficient CRC in the context of Lynch syndrome. In a mouse model for Lynch syndrome, we found a nearly complete loss of intestinal tumor development when animals were transferred from a conventional “open” animal facility to specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions. Using 16S sequencing we detected large changes in microbiota compositio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Msh2 V63E/V63E mice were only slightly more tumor-prone than WT mice, and showed drastically prolonged tumor-free survival as compared to Msh2 − / − mice, which all developed lymphomas within 4 months of age (Figure 1F and Supplementary Table S1 ) ( 25 ). Unfortunately, we could not study intestinal tumorigenesis in Msh2-Lynch and V63E-Lynch mice because the microbiota in our animal facility was unfavorable for intestinal tumor development ( 47 ). Instead, we investigated whether Msh2 V63E/V63E mice were susceptible to TMZ-induced lymphomagenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Msh2 V63E/V63E mice were only slightly more tumor-prone than WT mice, and showed drastically prolonged tumor-free survival as compared to Msh2 − / − mice, which all developed lymphomas within 4 months of age (Figure 1F and Supplementary Table S1 ) ( 25 ). Unfortunately, we could not study intestinal tumorigenesis in Msh2-Lynch and V63E-Lynch mice because the microbiota in our animal facility was unfavorable for intestinal tumor development ( 47 ). Instead, we investigated whether Msh2 V63E/V63E mice were susceptible to TMZ-induced lymphomagenesis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, (low levels of) methylating agents in the form of dietary components, bacterial metabolites or cigarette smoke may enhance cancer risk in patients with a single germline MSH2 V63E mutation ( 54 , 55 ). Unfortunately, we were not able to study this possibility as the microbiota composition in our current mouse facility did not support intestinal tumorigenesis ( 47 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This nding may explain the lack of any protective effect observed in LS carriers randomized to resistant starch despite increasing their levels of butyrate concentration in the CAPP2 randomized control trial in contrast to the protective effect observed in sporadic CRC [31]. Another MSH2 knockout mouse model exposed to conventional microbiome exhibited increased epithelial turnover rates, increased rate of spontaneous mutations in MSH2 de cient crypts and increased microsatellite instability compared to speci c pathogen free (SPF mice) [32]. The authors hypothesized that bacterial presence in MMR de cient crypts drives epithelial turnover and subsequent mutations in DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is believed that with an increase in the number of intestinal bacteria, hypersecretion of cytokines contributes to bacterial invasion into the dense layer of mucus. Bacterial invasion into the mucus layer and interaction with the epithelium may cause early stages of cellular transformation with a deficiency in DNA MMR as a consequence of increased epithelial proliferation[ 77 ].…”
Section: Gut Microbiota and Mechanisms Of Colon Cancer Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfer of Msh2-Lynch mice from a normal room to a specific SPF room resulted in an almost complete loss of the intestinal tumor phenotype and increased survival of the experimental animals. SPF mice showed a decrease or absence of Lactobacillus and Epsilonproteobacteria taxa in the feces[ 77 ]. In addition, transplantation of cryopreserved conventional feces into SPF mice did not restore the tumor phenotype but increased the rate of epithelial renewal and accelerated the development of microsatellite instability (MSI).…”
Section: Gut Microbiota and Genetic Heterogeneity In Crcmentioning
confidence: 99%