2012
DOI: 10.1021/jm201243p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privileged Scaffolds or Promiscuous Binders: A Comparative Study on Rhodanines and Related Heterocycles in Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract: Rhodanines and related five-membered heterocycles with multiple heteroatoms have recently gained a reputation of being unselective compounds that appear as "frequent hitters" in screening campaigns and therefore have little value in drug discovery. However, this judgment appears to be based mostly on anecdotal evidence. Having identified various rhodanines and related compounds in screening campaigns, we decided to perform a systematic study on their promiscuity. An amount of 163 rhodanines, hydantoins, thiohy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
255
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 268 publications
(264 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
8
255
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on steric considerations, we hypothesize that rhodanine is more likely to interact with the binuclear center of DNPEP via its exocyclic rather than endocyclic sulfur atom. Density function theory calculations predict that the highest occupied molecular orbital and negative electrostatic potential of the rhodanine ring localize predominantly to the exocyclic sulfur atom (Mendgen et al, 2012), which supports the proposed role of this site in metal coordination. Compound 347749 can be modeled into the DNPEP active site in a sterically acceptable fashion with the exocyclic sulfur binding in the bridging ligand position between the zinc ions and the negatively charged theoninyl side chain occupying the S1 pocket via an ionic interaction with Lys 370 and hydrogen-bonding interactions with surrounding protein groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on steric considerations, we hypothesize that rhodanine is more likely to interact with the binuclear center of DNPEP via its exocyclic rather than endocyclic sulfur atom. Density function theory calculations predict that the highest occupied molecular orbital and negative electrostatic potential of the rhodanine ring localize predominantly to the exocyclic sulfur atom (Mendgen et al, 2012), which supports the proposed role of this site in metal coordination. Compound 347749 can be modeled into the DNPEP active site in a sterically acceptable fashion with the exocyclic sulfur binding in the bridging ligand position between the zinc ions and the negatively charged theoninyl side chain occupying the S1 pocket via an ionic interaction with Lys 370 and hydrogen-bonding interactions with surrounding protein groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…2010; Mendgen et al, 2012). This compound is reportedly able to bind molecules in a promiscuous fashion leading to nonselective effects (Baell, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3,47 However, upregulating ΔFosB activity in a brain region specific way may also prove useful to enhance endogenous resilience mechanisms to combat depression. 6 While developing five-membered multiheterocyclics into drugs may be a long-term endeavor, 48,49 C2 and C6 can already be used as chemical tools, by administering them directly into the brain to tease apart the role of ΔFosB in repressive as well as activational transcriptional complexes and to assess the epigenetic state of its different target genes during maladaptive neural changes. Such molecular insight could guide assessment of the therapeutic utility of ΔFosB.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be also noted that 5-ylidene-4-thiazolidinone-3-carboxylic acids are among the preferred hitcompounds when using various in silico approaches with the subsequent experimental confirmation of the high affinity level to numerous biological targets [9]. Such findings are often criticized because of reffering 4-thiazolidiones to the so-called "frequent hitters" or "pan assay interference compounds (PAINS)" ("frequent hits" are compounds assigned as high-affinity ligands to the set of biotargets and tend to have a low specificity) [5,10,11]. Although, the debate of the importance of such approach remains open.…”
Section: скрининг противовирусной активности в ряду с5 и N3 замещенныхmentioning
confidence: 99%