1989
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(89)90062-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privatization in developing countries: a review of the issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because SOEs usually rely on state subsidies and protection, this incentive is lacking, and accounts for their inefficiency. Major protagonists in this school are Hanke [16], Cook and Kirkpatrick [7], Commander and Killick [18] and Van De Walle [3], their notion of efficiency being confined to the technical aspects.…”
Section: Privatization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because SOEs usually rely on state subsidies and protection, this incentive is lacking, and accounts for their inefficiency. Major protagonists in this school are Hanke [16], Cook and Kirkpatrick [7], Commander and Killick [18] and Van De Walle [3], their notion of efficiency being confined to the technical aspects.…”
Section: Privatization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth school that Lesser identifies is the 'fiscal benefits argument' which maintains that 'divestiture will cut government expenditure and help restore budgetary balance' [3]. Divestiture is said to reduce government expenditure; bring more revenue to the government 'from the sales proceeds realized from privatization which can be used to finance current expenditure or to write down the government's debt' [lo].…”
Section: Privatization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet gains in efficiency are more likely to result from an increase in market competition than from a change in ownership (Cook and Kirkpatrick 1988;Van de Walle 1989). Accordingly, if the principal objective of liberalization is to increase economic efficiency, the policy priority must be to increase competition.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectives On Liberalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common policy was large scale privatization of public enterprises. This divestiture was an attempt to reverse policies of the 1960s and 1970s when policy makers bad emphasized direct state intervention to try and correct perceived failures in private markets (van de Walle, 1989). The arguments for privatization are well known in terms of its impact on economic efficiency and national output since private firms are assumed to be more efficient than public enterprises (Goodman, 1985;Hanke, 1987;Butler, 1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%