Privatheit im Internet als Vertrauensschutz. Eine Neukonstruktion der Europäischen Grundrechte auf Privatleben und Datenschutz

Eichenhofer, Johannes

doi:10.3790/staa.55.1.41

Cited by 10 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…a DSGVO und womöglich als Oberbegriff 259 verankert -, dass die betroffene Person später von dem Umfang der Verarbeitung überrascht wird 260 und schafft insoweit schutzwürdiges Vertrauen. 261 269 etwa indem Transparenz zwischen den (gemeinsam) Verantwortlichen selbst hergestellt wird. Die speziellen Pflichten gemeinsam Verantwortlicher enthalten insoweit Transparenzerfordernisse, die nicht nur unmittelbar der Nachvollziehbarkeit für betroffene Personen dienen, sondern darüber hinaus andere Transparenz-Ausprägungen mit einem abweichenden Adressatenkreis enthalten.…”

Section: Bunclassified

Gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit unter der DSGVO

Radtke¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cooperation in the processing of personal data is particularly relevant on the Internet when, for example, third party content is embedded. The General Data Protection Regulation stipulates Joint Control as a technology-neutral concept to potentially cover such constellations (Art. 4 No. 7 GDPR, Art. 26 GDPR). The author discusses systematically the relevant case law of the European Court of Justice (Wirtschaftsakademie, Jehovah's Witnesses and Fashion ID), elaborates the preconditions of Joint Control and puts the legal figure in the context of the GDPR with its legal consequences such as claims for damages, supervisory measures and the internal relationship of Joint Controllers.

show abstract

Section: Bunclassified

Gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit unter der DSGVO

Radtke¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, the idea of notice and consent has been harshly criticized in privacy law as well as in political science (Helm and Seubert, 2020), due to the little amount of control it gives the users (Hartzog and Richards, 2016), especially with regard to the Internet. Hence, many legal scientists debate about the need for a further regulation (Gusy et al, 2016: 385) or self-regulation (Fernback and Papacharissi, 2007) or for replacing the control-through a trust-paradigm (Eichenhofer, 2016;Hartzog and Richards, 2016).…”

Section: Legal Sciencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…4. For a detailed analysis of the relationship of privacy and data protection, see Eichenhofer (2016) and Gusy (2018). 5. https://www.torproject.org/ (accessed 7 November 2019).…”

Section: Fundingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Hence, many legal scientists debate about the need for a further regulation (Gusy et. al., 2016: 385) or self-regulation (Fernback and Papachariisi, 2007) or for replacing the control-through a trust-paradigm (Hartzog and Richards, 2016;Eichenhofer, 2016).…”

Section: Legal Sciencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…https://www.eff.org/issues/anonymity (accessed 6 November 2019)4 for a detailed analysis of the relationship of privacy and data protection see(Eichenhofer, 2016;Gusy, 2018).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Linking loose ends: An interdisciplinary privacy and communication model

Bräunlich

Dienlin

Eichenhofer

et al. 2020

New Media & Society

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the recent decades, privacy scholarship has made significant progress. Most of it was achieved in monodisciplinary works. However, privacy has a deeply interdisciplinary nature. Most importantly, societies as well as individuals experience privacy as being influenced by legal, technical, and social norms and structures. In this article, we hence attempt to connect insights of different academic disciplines into a joint model, an Interdisciplinary Privacy and Communication Model. The model differentiates four different elements: communication context, protection needs, threat and risk analysis, as well as protection enforcement. On the one hand, with this model, we aim to describe how privacy unfolds. On the other hand, the model also prescribes how privacy can be furnished and regulated. As such, the model contributes to a general understanding of privacy as a theoretical guide and offers a practical basis to address new challenges of the digital age.

show abstract

Artificial Intelligence and the Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Opening the Door for Technological Innovation and Innovative Protection

Marsch

2019

Regulating Artificial Intelligence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Privatheit im Internet als Vertrauensschutz. Eine Neukonstruktion der Europäischen Grundrechte auf Privatleben und Datenschutz

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit unter der DSGVO

Gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit unter der DSGVO

Linking loose ends: An interdisciplinary privacy and communication model

Artificial Intelligence and the Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Opening the Door for Technological Innovation and Innovative Protection

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About