Private Message Transmission by Common Driving of Two Chaotic Lasers

Annovazzi-Lodi, V.; Aromataris, Giuseppe; Benedetti, Mauro; Merlo, S.

doi:10.1109/jqe.2009.2030895

Cited by 43 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As already pointed out in (Annovazzi-Lodi et al 2010), the same Drv can be shared by different private interconnections, i.e., by different pairs of Tx/Rx.…”

Section: The Close-loop Three-laser Configurationmentioning

confidence: 93%

“…Since this specific working point had been previously optimized for the open loop (Annovazzi-Lodi et al 2010), these results suggest that the close-loop scheme is more demanding in terms of matching and trimming, and thus, that it is more challenging for an eavesdropper. However, more extensive experimental and numerical investigations should be done to fully evaluate the new scheme, and for a thorough comparison with the open loop in terms of privacy.…”

Section: Laser Parameter Mismatchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An alternative to the standard two-laser scheme (Donati and Mirasso 2002;Larger and Goedgebuer 2004), where synchronization is obtained by a master-slave combination, was recently proposed (Annovazzi-Lodi et al 2010), based on a paper by Yamamoto et al (Yamamoto et al 2007). In this approach, a pair of twin lasers is optically injected by a common chaotic signal generated by a third laser, driven to chaos by delayed optical feedback.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Under suitable operating conditions, the twin lasers generate the same chaos, i.e., they are synchronized. A numerical analysis of the feasibility and privacy of this method has been presented in the case of the open loop (Annovazzi-Lodi et al 2010), when the twin lasers are not subject to local feedback and they are chaotic only due to injection from the third laser.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Close-loop three-laser scheme for chaos-encrypted message transmission

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we numerically evaluate private data transmission using a three-laser scheme, consisting of a pair of twin semiconductor lasers, driven to chaos by delayed optical feedback in a short cavity, and optically injected by a third chaotic laser which forces them to synchronize. This laser is selected with different internal parameters with respect to the twin pair, so that the emissions of the synchronized, matched lasers, are highly correlated, whereas their correlation with the driver is low. The digital message modulates the emission of the transmitter, as in a standard Chaos Modulation scheme. Message recovery is then obtained by subtracting, from the transmitted chaos-masked message, the chaos, locally generated by the synchronized receiver laser. Simulations have been performed with the Lang-Kobayashi model, and, in view of application to private transmission, we have investigated the effect of the parameter mismatch, between transmitter and receiver, on message recovery. A preliminary experimental evaluation has been also performed using specially designed InP integrated modules

show abstract

“…As already pointed out in (Annovazzi-Lodi et al 2010), the same Drv can be shared by different private interconnections, i.e., by different pairs of Tx/Rx.…”

Section: The Close-loop Three-laser Configurationmentioning

confidence: 93%

Section: Laser Parameter Mismatchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Close-loop three-laser scheme for chaos-encrypted message transmission

et al. 2010

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Alternatives to the standard approach, still based on delayed optical feedback, have been also studied, and a remarkably different one, using three lasers [25,26], is shown in Figure 2. Here, a common chaotic master laser (driver, DRV) injects two slave lasers (SL1, SL2), one at the transmitter (Tx) and the other at the receiver (Rx).…”

Section: Chaos-protected Transmission Schemesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Private Communications Using Optical Chaos

Annovazzi-Lodi¹,

Aromataris²,

Benedetti³

2018

Chaos Theory

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

After a brief summary of the basic methods for secure transmission using optical chaos, we report on most recent achievements, namely, on the comparison between the standard two-laser and the three-laser schemes and on the network architecture for multiuser secure transmission. From our investigations, we found that while both the basic twolaser and the three-laser schemes are suitable to secure data exchange, the three-laser scheme offers a better level of privacy due to its symmetrical topology. Moreover, while transmission based on optical chaos is usually restricted to point-to-point interconnections, a more advanced solution, derived from the well-known public key cryptography, allows for private message transmission between any couple of subscribers in a network.

show abstract

Chaotic Communications in Semiconductor Lasers

Ohtsubo¹

2017

Springer Series in Optical Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Private Message Transmission by Common Driving of Two Chaotic Lasers

Cited by 43 publications

References 17 publications

Close-loop three-laser scheme for chaos-encrypted message transmission

Close-loop three-laser scheme for chaos-encrypted message transmission

Private Communications Using Optical Chaos

Chaotic Communications in Semiconductor Lasers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About