2006
DOI: 10.1080/13504850500378247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private label price rigidity during holiday periods

Abstract: Using weekly retail transaction scanner price data from a large U.S supermarket chain, we find significantly higher retail price rigidity for private label products than for nationally branded products during the Christmas and Thanksgiving holiday periods relative to the rest of the year. The finding cannot be explained by changes in holiday period promotional practices because we find that private label promotions appear to diminish at least as much as national brands. The increased rigidity of private label … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
10
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm that significantly higher retail price rigidity is found for private label products than for nationally branded products (Müller et al 2006). A plausible explanation is that when national brands raise their prices, they lose fewer sales to private labels than private labels lose to national brands when private labels raise their prices (Sivakumar and Raj 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results confirm that significantly higher retail price rigidity is found for private label products than for nationally branded products (Müller et al 2006). A plausible explanation is that when national brands raise their prices, they lose fewer sales to private labels than private labels lose to national brands when private labels raise their prices (Sivakumar and Raj 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 70%
“…Price changes for energy products are decisively more frequent than for food products and services, and there is higher change frequency in supermarkets than in small shops (Baudry and Sevestre 2004;Aucremanne and Dhyne 2004;Perez-Mesa et al 2010). Moreover, significantly higher retail price rigidity is found for private label products than for nationally branded products (Müller et al 2006). Recently, in the digital era some authors (Wang et al 2019) have shown that in the fresh food context, the online and offline markets are of different business models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finding a signi…cant higher price rigidity for private label products relative to national brands, they rule out di¤erent promotional practices as well as other potential explanations. Müller et al (2006) explain the increased rigidity of private label product prices partly by the increased rigidity of wholesale prices as well as the increased emphasis on social consumption during holiday periods. Due to this, the customers' value of nationally branded products is higher relative to the private label brands.…”
Section: Model Of Cyclical Changes In Firm Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Müller et al (2006) focus on di¤erences in price rigidity for private label vs. nationally branded products prior to Christmas. Finding a signi…cant higher price rigidity for private label products relative to national brands, they rule out di¤erent promotional practices as well as other potential explanations.…”
Section: Model Of Cyclical Changes In Firm Conductmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, they use 27 192 price time series. The same data set has been used by Chevalier et al (2003), Levy et al (2002), Levy et al (2005Levy et al ( , 2006, Mu¨ller et al (2006), and Ray et al (2006).…”
Section: In This Issuementioning
confidence: 99%