1972
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511563218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private Investment in India 1900–1939

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not the case in the other important industrial belt of Bombay during this time (Bagchi 1972). In the 1930s, most of these industries had gone through a recession, and net investment by the firms controlling them had slowed down or disappeared altogether.…”
Section: Industrialization In West Bengal In the Context Of A More LImentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This was not the case in the other important industrial belt of Bombay during this time (Bagchi 1972). In the 1930s, most of these industries had gone through a recession, and net investment by the firms controlling them had slowed down or disappeared altogether.…”
Section: Industrialization In West Bengal In the Context Of A More LImentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In 1901-02, the home charges amounted to £ 17.36 million (Bagchi, 1970). During 1921-22, these charges sharply increased to 40% of the total revenue of the British Government (see fig.…”
Section: March 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 In India, the power struggles waged before Independence were played out within the master struggle between British imperialism and Indian nationalism. 36 Indian business leaders may not have been the driving force behind political change, but with the future direction of the nation in question many of their number, including Thakurdas, allied themselves with the Indian National Congress, which under the leadership of Gandhi and Nehru grew progressively in strength during the 1920s to exact complete independence in 1929. The overriding objective of pro-Congress business leaders, through discourse and direct involvement in the politics of transition, was to nurture entrepreneurialism and business growth in India, resisting as a matter of utmost priority the forces of socialism and extremism within Congress.…”
Section: Research Processmentioning
confidence: 99%