2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2014.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private incentives for the emergence of co-production of offshore wind energy and mussel aquaculture

Abstract: Technological solutions to increase the efficiency of spatial use can play a key role as part of the toolbox of marine spatial planning. Co-locating of multiple ocean uses can potentially increase the production and enjoyment of the ocean while limiting impacts. However, a basic precondition for co-locating or coproduction is that all parties' private incentives are aligned. We use a case study of co-locating an offshore wind energy firm and a mussel aquaculture firm to assess the incentive structure for coope… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the synergy between offshore aquaculture and wind parks is subject to investigation (van den Burg et al 2013;Röckmann et al 2015), there is considerable uncertainty about financial benefits. Benefits are expected from combined operations and maintenance (Michler-Cieluch et al 2009;Lagerveld et al 2014;Griffin et al 2015). Negative effects may come from increased costs for insurance in multi-use setting where multiple production functions (e.g.…”
Section: Financial Conflicts and Benefits Of Multi-usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the synergy between offshore aquaculture and wind parks is subject to investigation (van den Burg et al 2013;Röckmann et al 2015), there is considerable uncertainty about financial benefits. Benefits are expected from combined operations and maintenance (Michler-Cieluch et al 2009;Lagerveld et al 2014;Griffin et al 2015). Negative effects may come from increased costs for insurance in multi-use setting where multiple production functions (e.g.…”
Section: Financial Conflicts and Benefits Of Multi-usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, for the latter, a high political representation by stakeholders is observed, that possess some degree of "client" mentality towards decision-makers in the offshore realm. It implies in this context that financial powerful and political influential «newcomers», such as offshore wind farm operators, effect the political and economic environment in providing favorable operation conditions Griffin et al 2015). These fundamental differences between the different stakeholders in near-shore and offshore waters make a streamlined approach to multiple use or conflict management difficult.…”
Section: Current Knowledge On Socio-economic Effects Of Offshore Aquamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the significant volume of subsidies already used to promote wind energy and smarter use of offshore resources, relatively modest technical or financial support for co-production could provide the catalyst to more fully scope this idea and hopefully move the focus of marine spatial planning a little closer to collaborative solutions (Griffin et al 2015). In this regard, building partnerships amongst actors and increasing 'social capital' can be a way forward in multi-use offshore aquaculture.…”
Section: Implications For Assessing the Socio-economic Effects Of Offmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Economists have addressed the question of economic feasibility [15,16], while others have focused on planning issues [17] and identification of the proper sites for MUPS [18]. These multi-use platforms are difficult to realize as they come with a set of complex knowledge questions, challenges for governance, and issues of sustainability, and require cross-sectoral cooperation [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%