2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.1322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Private Equity and Dermatology—First, Do No Harm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(10 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relevant to the dermatologic surgeon, these articles cite the strategic use of Mohs surgeons across multiple locations and states in order to maximize internal referrals, the increased use of NPPs in effort to increase procedural volume, blurring of lines between NPPs and dermatologists to minimize employee compensation, and upselling of cosmetic services and cosmetic product lines to expand revenue. [23][24][25][26] Perspectives from other surgical specialties, such as orthopedics, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology, discuss various issues of concern to the surgeon employed by PE.…”
Section: Perspective Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relevant to the dermatologic surgeon, these articles cite the strategic use of Mohs surgeons across multiple locations and states in order to maximize internal referrals, the increased use of NPPs in effort to increase procedural volume, blurring of lines between NPPs and dermatologists to minimize employee compensation, and upselling of cosmetic services and cosmetic product lines to expand revenue. [23][24][25][26] Perspectives from other surgical specialties, such as orthopedics, neurosurgery, and otolaryngology, discuss various issues of concern to the surgeon employed by PE.…”
Section: Perspective Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proponents of PE acquisition often assert that revenue generation from target hospitals via taxation is a societal boon, while the patients they serve may benefit from economies of scale, management expertise, and an incentive to implement cost-effective care. 5 , 7 , 29 , 30 , 31 Critics assert that PE firms, unlike other for-profit institutions, have an inherent incentive to favor short-term returns rather than long-term investments (eg, information technologies and care redesign) that would otherwise meaningfully improve population health. 29 , 32 In certain aspects of health care services, the latter view has been bolstered by important research 13 , 14 , 33 , 34 in nursing homes and outpatient clinical practices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 5 , 7 , 29 , 30 , 31 Critics assert that PE firms, unlike other for-profit institutions, have an inherent incentive to favor short-term returns rather than long-term investments (eg, information technologies and care redesign) that would otherwise meaningfully improve population health. 29 , 32 In certain aspects of health care services, the latter view has been bolstered by important research 13 , 14 , 33 , 34 in nursing homes and outpatient clinical practices. Private equity–owned nursing facilities performed comparably, both in terms of equipment shortages and resident outbreaks, during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of our colleagues in dermatology have called for banning the sale of their practices to private equity firms until they have more meaningful data on how these transactions impact quality and affordability of care for patients. 13 Although this type of action may not be feasible, it does at least point to the fact that we must continue open and transparent conversations about PE's role in our field and staying engaged in these conversations to protect the field and our patients.…”
Section: Looking Aheadmentioning
confidence: 99%