2011
DOI: 10.3386/w17124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Privacy and Innovation

Abstract: Information and communication technology now enables firms to collect detailed and potentially intrusive data about their customers both easily and cheaply. This means that privacy concerns are no longer limited to government surveillance and public figures' private lives. The empirical literature on privacy regulation shows that privacy regulation may affect the extent and direction of data-based innovation. We also show that the impact of privacy regulation can be extremely heterogeneous. Therefore, we argue… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, because this ad product and data did not exist at the time of the natural experiment, this procedure assumes that the desire for privacy controls remains static in the target groups over time or at least that if there was a change, all target groups changed at the same rate. This assumption is based on empirical evidence that suggests that although the absolute level of privacy desires can change, the rate of change across demographic groups does not differ (Goldfarb and Tucker 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, because this ad product and data did not exist at the time of the natural experiment, this procedure assumes that the desire for privacy controls remains static in the target groups over time or at least that if there was a change, all target groups changed at the same rate. This assumption is based on empirical evidence that suggests that although the absolute level of privacy desires can change, the rate of change across demographic groups does not differ (Goldfarb and Tucker 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in the privacy realm, we can reconcile contrasting findings by reiterating, first, the contextual nature of privacy trade‐offs; second, by observing that binary metrics (such as absence vs. presence of regulation) are too coarse to capture the complex effects of privacy protection. The decisive factor in determining the effect of privacy regulation on innovation or welfare may not be its existence, but the specifics of the intervention (Goldfarb & Tucker, 2012). Well thought‐out interventions can protect privacy and stimulate growth (Adjerid et al., 2016); poorly thought‐out ones may achieve neither goal.…”
Section: The Supply Side Of Privacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this discussion is put in a wider context of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the authors make clear that an expanded AI industry, in which data flows are an important factor, would have clear implications for services trade. Similarly, Goldfarb and Tucker (2012) point out that privacy regulations may harm innovative activities, particularly in services. They present the results of previous case studies they undertook with respect to two services sectors, namely health services and online advertising.…”
Section: Previous Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%