Privacy and Identity Management for the Future Internet in the Age of Globalisation

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-18621-4

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Concerns about a loss of digital self-determination exist, just like those regarding the "right to be forgotten" or the right to become invisible and unseen. While the idea of a "transparent user" -as the ultimate notion of (in)voluntary visibility -has caused a broad outcry in society and in scientific debates a few years ago (Palfrey & Gasser, 2008), the discussion has shifted toward considerations of Internet governance and regulation (Camenisch, Fischer-Hübner, & Hansen, 2015). Brighenti (2010, p. 109) has pointed out that visibility has long been one of the key aspects "associated with the public sphere" and that in today's digitized publics, the "project of democracy can no longer be imagined without taking into account visibility and its outcomes" (Brighenti, 2010, p. 189).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Visibility in the digital age: Introduction

Brantner

Stehle

2021

SComS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the digital age, calls for transparency and openness as well as for privacy and confidentiality prevail: Struggles for visibility occur simultaneously with conflicts regarding invisibility and hidden battles for power and privileges of interpretation. Concerns about a loss of digital self-determination exist, just like those regarding the “right to be forgotten” or the right to become invisible and unseen. While the idea of a “transparent user” – as the ultimate notion of (in)voluntary visibility – has caused a broad outcry in society and in scientific debates a few years ago (Palfrey & Gasser, 2008), the discussion has shifted toward considerations of Internet governance and regulation (Camenisch, Fischer-Hübner, & Hansen, 2015). Brighenti (2010, p. 109) has pointed out that visibility has long been one of the key aspects “associated with the public sphere” and that in today’s digitized publics, the “project of democracy can no longer be imagined without taking into account visibility and its outcomes” (Brighenti, 2010, p. 189). Visibility and invisibility, along with their societal outcomes, are increasingly being discussed and analyzed, as they are becoming important dimensions in the accurate description and explanation of digital communication.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Visibility in the digital age: Introduction

Brantner

Stehle

2021

SComS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Data are in the eye of the beholder: Co‐creation for sustainable personal data value

Stelmaszak,

Parry

2023

Strategic Change

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent scholarship re‐casts the value of data from financial to value in use, where value is a multi‐faceted, dynamic, emergent construct, co‐created by stakeholders. To date, the dynamics of the co‐creation of value from the use of personal data have been investigated from the starting point of use. However, personal data do not have inherent value, rather their value emerges during design against projected future use. We conducted a case study of the development of a personalized e‐book and captured the different perceptions of the value of personal data from firm, intermediary, and customer perspectives, namely means to an end, medium of exchange, and net benefit, respectively. The diversity of perspectives highlights ontological differences in the perception of what data are, which in turn creates epistemological tensions and different expectations of the characteristics of data embedded in value co‐creation. By detailing how the value of personal data is co‐created in practice, we argue that co‐creation during design creates conditions for sustainable data value necessary for the continuing operation of products and services based on personalization.

show abstract

Privacy Beyond Confidentiality, Data Science Beyond Spying: From Movement Data and Data Privacy Towards a Wider Fundamental Rights Discourse

Berendt

2019

Privacy Technologies and Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although privacy and AI / data science are multi-faceted concepts, there is an increasing trend to focus on only a subset of their meaning: privacy as data privacy, with a focus on confidentiality, and AI / data science as a threat to autonomy and privacy, through data collection, unwanted inferences, and profiling. However, confidentiality and "invisibility" are not always constitutive of privacy as "the freedom from unreasonable constraints on the construction of one's own identity"-in some cases, visibility can be more important, and data collection, presentation, and inferences can help and extend a desired visibility. In this position paper, I will focus on a specific application around these phenomena: the analysis of vehicle/human trajectory data. I will discuss two recent examples of the analysis of such data: the New York City taxi rides dataset, and the use of data from the maritime Automatic Information System (AIS) for mapping refugee movements on the Mediterranean Sea. The goal is to encourage a discussion as to whether and how such wider fundamental-rights questions and their implications for privacy, data protection, and technology can and should be investigated in the scope of APF.

show abstract

Privacy and Identity Management for the Future Internet in the Age of Globalisation

Cited by 4 publications

References 19 publications

Visibility in the digital age: Introduction

Visibility in the digital age: Introduction

Data are in the eye of the beholder: Co‐creation for sustainable personal data value

Privacy Beyond Confidentiality, Data Science Beyond Spying: From Movement Data and Data Privacy Towards a Wider Fundamental Rights Discourse

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About