2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2009.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prisons' preparedness for pandemic flu and the ethical issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to more general challenges in managing health issues within secure environments [ 50 , 51 ], we found evidence that dispersed correctional systems that combine rapid turnover (jails) and longer term (prisons) detention facilities, with frequent interfacility transfers, influence disease transmission dynamics. Rapid turnover creates an inflow of people in rapidly consecutive cohorts (a “revolving doors” effect [ 52 ]). An inflow of susceptible people within a closed or semi-open community experiencing an outbreak, has been shown to slow the creation of herd immunity and can act as a transmission amplifier [ 53 , 54 ], while interfacility transfers can facilitate disease spread: “ Contacts occurred during inmate transports between prisons, at a courthouse, and within the prisons (…) Prisons and prison transport vehicles are crowded environments that create potential for the spread of respiratory and other infections including measles, rubella, chickenpox, tuberculosis and meningococcal disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to more general challenges in managing health issues within secure environments [ 50 , 51 ], we found evidence that dispersed correctional systems that combine rapid turnover (jails) and longer term (prisons) detention facilities, with frequent interfacility transfers, influence disease transmission dynamics. Rapid turnover creates an inflow of people in rapidly consecutive cohorts (a “revolving doors” effect [ 52 ]). An inflow of susceptible people within a closed or semi-open community experiencing an outbreak, has been shown to slow the creation of herd immunity and can act as a transmission amplifier [ 53 , 54 ], while interfacility transfers can facilitate disease spread: “ Contacts occurred during inmate transports between prisons, at a courthouse, and within the prisons (…) Prisons and prison transport vehicles are crowded environments that create potential for the spread of respiratory and other infections including measles, rubella, chickenpox, tuberculosis and meningococcal disease.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transport system that supports a devolved correctional system, sets this environment apart from other crowded environments such as boarding schools, and aligns it with aspects of military camps ” [ 55 ]. All this, combined with factors associated with living conditions, can favour infectious disease transmission: “ Detainees are more likely to become infected as a result of significant overcrowding in prisons, poor living conditions, poor nutrition, and physical and emotional stress ” [ 52 ]. Finally, it should be noted that “ If an individual is in a correctional institution, the primary purpose of the setting are custody and confinement.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This current coronavirus pandemic has been difficult to manage in all countries and contexts. Prisons and other correctional facilities are, by their very nature, places of close physical proximity (the main frequent mechanisms of contagion and transmission ofCOVID- 19), particularly sensitive to the impact of this pandemic (Bedford et al, 2020;Hoff et al, 2009;WHO, 2020b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such capacities have recently been documented in the Philippines (Gaillard, Casing‐Baring, Sacayan, Balay‐As, & Santos, ). In parallel, a larger number of studies have dealt with the effect of infectious disease and epidemics in prisons and therefore provide useful elements of comparison when dealing with disasters (e.g., Fraser, ; Rieder et al., ; Schwartz, ; Van't Hoff, Fedosejeva, & Mihailescu, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%