2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00308.x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prison health and public health responses at a regional prison in Western Australia

Abstract: Objective: To describe the health of inmates in a Western Australian regional prison and evaluate the coverage of public health interventions. Design: Cross‐sectional audit of all paper‐based and electronic medical notes of inmates at one regional prison in Western Australia. Setting: A mixed medium‐security prison in regional Western Australia. Participants: 185 prisoners, 170 men and 15 women Main Results: The prisoners were mainly young (70% < 35 years of age) and Indigenous (84%). Fifty two pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three further studies involved clinical audits, with two of the three [45,47] comparing HBsAg prevalence among Indigenous and non-Indigenous prisoners. These two studies in prisoners had small samples sizes (101 and 185), and were conducted mostly in males (>80%), with one study showing a higher HBsAg prevalence among Indigenous (3%) compared with non-Indigenous prisoners (1%) and the other found a similar prevalence of 3% among Indigenous and non-Indigenous prisoners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three further studies involved clinical audits, with two of the three [45,47] comparing HBsAg prevalence among Indigenous and non-Indigenous prisoners. These two studies in prisoners had small samples sizes (101 and 185), and were conducted mostly in males (>80%), with one study showing a higher HBsAg prevalence among Indigenous (3%) compared with non-Indigenous prisoners (1%) and the other found a similar prevalence of 3% among Indigenous and non-Indigenous prisoners.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the 36 studies, four were conducted in urban areas, 28,37,40,43 10 in regional, 30,34,38,41,[44][45][46][47]49,55 seven in remote, 27,33,35,42,[52][53][54] 12 were conducted in multiple geographical locations or were national analyses with no breakdown by location 29,36,39,50,51,[56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and two did not provide enough information to determine a geographical location. 32,43 There were two studies conducted in SA, 27,37 four in WA, 29,30,33,48 five in Qld, 39,41,42,44,52 nine in NSW, 28,32,34,…”
Section: Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US, ongoing disparities in income and education and the pervasiveness of poverty all impact negatively on the mental health and wellbeing of American Indian and Alaska Native peoples and lead to early morbidity and mortality [14]. Indigenous populations in Canada, the United States, Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand are over-represented in prisons [15,16] and those with mental illness constitute some of the most vulnerable groups in society, experiencing further isolation and stigmatisation as a result of their illness and often facing additional risks from racial discrimination [17]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%