2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.lpm.2010.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prise en charge médicale de la grève de la faim en milieu carcéral

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to famine (Chappell et al, 2013;Séguy & Théré, 2016) or hunger strikes (Fayeulle et al, 2010), which have distinct meanings-one arising from a scarcity of food and the other involving a refusal to eat as a form of protest to make a lasting impact (Chalit Hernandez, 2022) -fasting represents a purposeful and intentional abstention from food for a de ned period, driven by a speci c goal (Attinà et al, 2021;Mattson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Intermittent Fastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to famine (Chappell et al, 2013;Séguy & Théré, 2016) or hunger strikes (Fayeulle et al, 2010), which have distinct meanings-one arising from a scarcity of food and the other involving a refusal to eat as a form of protest to make a lasting impact (Chalit Hernandez, 2022) -fasting represents a purposeful and intentional abstention from food for a de ned period, driven by a speci c goal (Attinà et al, 2021;Mattson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Intermittent Fastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study of prison hunger strikes in France showed that 15% of strikes were not monitored at all; only 28% of doctors respected the patient’s wishes; and most hunger strikers (90.7%) received no help with refeeding at the end of their strike, despite the high risk of medical complications (Fayeulle et al 2010). The European Court of Human Rights affirms states’ right to force-hydrate and force-feed hunger strikers in case of therapeutic necessity, unless hunger strikers signed a “statement of nonintervention,” as they may do in the Netherlands and some Swiss cantons.…”
Section: The Medical Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While prison authorities recognize some of these general responsibilities, such as the recording and medical monitoring of the hunger strike, they do not typically respect incarcerated persons’ right to hunger strike. As noted above, French prison authorities fail to systematically provide medical supervision for hunger strikes (Fayeulle et al 2010). Pennsylvania’s DOC mandates daily medical staff visits but charges hunger strikers a $25 co-pay for each (DC-ADM 820)—a forbidding deterrent given that most work assignments pay between $0.19 and $0.51 per hour (ACLU and GHRC 2023).…”
Section: The Remedial Accountmentioning
confidence: 99%