Priority Setting of Health Interventions: The Need for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Abstract

Priority setting of health interventions is often ad-hoc and resources are not used to an optimal extent. Underlying problem is that multiple criteria play a role and decisions are complex. Interventions may be chosen to maximize general population health, to reduce health inequalities of disadvantaged or vulnerable groups, ad/or to respond to life-threatening situations, all with respect to practical and budgetary constraints. This is the type of problem that policy makers are typically bad at solving rationally, unaided. They tend to use heuristic or intuitive approaches to simplify complexity, and in the process, important information is ignored. Next, policy makers may select interventions for only political motives.This indicates the need for rational and transparent approaches to priority setting. Over the past decades, a number of approaches have been developed, including evidence-based medicine, burden of disease analyses, cost-effectiveness analyses, and equity analyses. However, these approaches concentrate on single criteria only, whereas in reality, policy makers need to make choices taking into account multiple criteria simultaneously. Moreover, they do not cover all criteria that are relevant to policy makers. Therefore, the development of a multi-criteria approach to priority setting is necessary, and this has indeed recently been identified as one of the most important issues in health system research. In other scientific disciplines, multi-criteria decision analysis is well developed, has gained widespread acceptance and is routinely used. This paper presents the main principles of multicriteria decision analysis. There are only a very few applications to guide resource allocation decisions in health. We call for a shift away from present priority setting tools in health -that tend to focus on single criteria -towards transparent and systematic approaches that take into account all relevant criteria simultaneously.

Efetividade da atenção pré-natal e de puericultura em unidades básicas de saúde do Sul e do Nordeste do Brasil

“…A avaliação de intervenções em saúde por múltiplos critérios tem sido destacada como uma das mais importantes estratégias para o estudo da efetividade e do impacto dos sistemas de saúde. 15 Observou-se uma perda progressiva de efetividade, desde a organização da oferta de ações individuais e coletivas, passando pela capacitação dos profissionais e uso de protocolos, até as coberturas populacionais dos programas. A baixa cobertura de pré-natal e puericultura pelo serviço da área de abrangência foi consistente com outros estudos brasileiros.…”

3. How comprehensive can we be in the economic assessment of vaccines?

“…The Cauliflower Value Toolbox could be helpful in the future development of a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) programme for vaccines [36,37]. This approach was not initially intended when developing the tool, as the different florets of the cauliflower were developed independently with their own outcome measures, evaluation techniques, and timetables.…”

Choosing health technology assessment and systematic review topics: The development of priority-setting criteria for patients’ and consumers’ interests

“…made final editorial decisions throughout 2006, evolving an explicit categorization of the multiple criteria routinely influencing decisions to reject or proceed with a topic. A theoretical framework and potential data sources for the topic selection process were developed using the poll results and the principles of multi-criteria decision analysis priority setting (2). With each decision, the framework and list of criteria was re-appraised and modified, until decisions no longer led to further modifications.…”