Priority setting for mental health research in Chile

Abstract

BackgroundScientific knowledge is a fundamental tool for making informed health policy decisions, but the link between health research and public policy decision-making is often missing. This study aims to identify and prioritize a national set of research gaps in mental health.MethodsA multi-approach method to identify gaps in knowledge was developed, including (1) document analysis and identification of possible research questions, (2) interviews to Ministry of Health key informants, (3) focus groups with different stakeholders, and (4) a web consultation addressed to academics. The identified gaps were translated to a standardized format of research questions. Criteria for prioritization were extracted from interviews and focus groups. Then, a team of various professionals applied them for scoring each question research.FindingsFifty-four people participated in the knowledge gaps identification process through an online consultation (n = 23) and focus groups (n = 18). Prioritization criteria identified were: extent of the knowledge gap, size of the objective population, potential benefit, vulnerability, urgency and applicability. 155 research questions were prioritized, of which 44% were related to evaluation of systems and/or health programs, and 26% to evaluation of interventions, including questions related to cost-effectiveness. 30% of the research questions came from the online consultation, and 36% from key informants. Users groups contributed with 10% of total research questions.ConclusionA final priority setting for mental health research was reached, making available for authorities and research agencies a list of 155 research questions ordered by relevance. The experience documented here could serve to other countries interested in developing a similar process.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13033-017-0168-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Virtual World Café Method for Identifying Mental Health Research Priorities: Methodological Case Study

“…The ideas generation phase of this previous work was a face-to-face forum of 25 participants, who generated more than 80 research topics. Similar research on priority-setting for mental health research in Chile using multiple methods of interviews, focus groups, and a web survey (total n = 54) identified 155 research topics [ 23 ]. It is possible that the online methods enabled people in our current study to be more open with their ideas.…”

National Health Policy Reform for Primary Care in Chile: A Qualitative Analysis of the Health Program Documents

“…Yet, we must be mindful that Chile does not have a periodical process to review, identify, and prioritize national health research needs. 115…”

Living with bipolar disorder in Chile: A qualitative study

“…In summary, in Chile, it is a priority to research about the effectiveness of interventions, which are focused on reducing the stigmatization of individuals with mental illnesses by the general population and the scope of the effect that stigma has on treatment adherence, among these individuals with severe mental illnesses (Zitko et al ).…”

“…Among the priorities for research in Chile is the need of research about the effectiveness of interventions focused on reducing the stigmatization of individuals with a mental illness in the general population and the scope by which the effect of the stigma has on treatment adherence, among individuals with severe mental illnesses (Zitko et al ). For this reason, researching people with DB is crucial to understand their needs and consequently design interventions tailored to their needs.…”