2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.09.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priority Rule-based Planning Approaches for Regeneration Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the comparison the behavior of both process flow models, the asynchronous flow A responds slightly better to high load, in terms of the expected extra charges for delays. The better behavior of the process flow A together with the compound slack rule (CR+SPT) is consistent with the better results found in recent research [ 36 ] where the penalty in MRO operations is explored based on a simple generic process.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the comparison the behavior of both process flow models, the asynchronous flow A responds slightly better to high load, in terms of the expected extra charges for delays. The better behavior of the process flow A together with the compound slack rule (CR+SPT) is consistent with the better results found in recent research [ 36 ] where the penalty in MRO operations is explored based on a simple generic process.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…A recent research contribution seeks an integrated approach combining the study of dispatching rules with parts pooling sourcing for service [ 35 ]. In addition, recent research prospects look for an overall optimization of service-oriented production and business management [ 36 ]. This study uses a simple example of theoretical sequencing to illustrate the integration of cost penalties of tardiness in the operation decisions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12] Concurrently, the data required for planning increases, as does the influence of planning-relevant information that is not or only vaguely available. [13] In addition to industrial production, this in particular applies to sectors in highly dynamic market environments such as the regeneration of complex capital goods in the MRO industry, where reliable and at the same time ambitious delivery times have to be communicated to customers at an early stage despite sometimes still completely unknown order specifications [14]. Other examples are large-scale projects from the construction industry or research and development [15].…”
Section: Theoretical Background: Dynamic-induced Challenges In Production Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a multi-project situation, it is promising to consider the specific characteristics of the different projects, e.g., concerning the due date or tardiness costs, cf. Hoffmann et al (2017). In our approach, if we decide to consider specific project priorities, which is necessary when we operate with project-specific activity lists single and possible when we use the project-specific random keys , we select the next activity to be scheduled out of the current set of eligible activities in two steps.…”
Section: Representing Project Prioritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our idea to jointly consider a portfolio of flexible projects of the type introduced in Kellenbrink and Helber (2015) has originally been presented in Hoffmann et al (2017) and Hoffmann and Kellenbrink (2018). The contribution of this current paper is to present and evaluate the model formulation and novel algorithms to simultaneously schedule entire portfolios of flexible projects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%