2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191580
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Priority Queue Based Reactive Buffer Management Policy for Delay Tolerant Network under City Based Environments

Abstract: Delay Tolerant Network (DTN) multi-copy routing protocols are privileged to create and transmit multiple copies of each message that causes congestion and some messages are dropped. This process is known as reactive drop because messages were dropped re-actively to overcome buffer overflows. The existing reactive buffer management policies apply a single metric to drop source, relay and destine messages. Hereby, selection to drop a message is dubious because each message as source, relay or destine may have co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess the routing performance of DCEE-GIP, the opportunistic network environment (ONE) [11,12] simulator was adopted to perform numerous simulation experiments. For attesting to the superiority of DCEE-GIP, we chose direct delivery (DD) [5], which is the most energy-efficient routing algorithm (in theory), epidemic [8], which is the representative of flooding algorithms without any constraints, spray & wait [7], which is the classic routing algorithm with the best comprehensive performance, and EASE [23], which is an energy-efficient algorithm based on the sleep mechanism published in 2021 and GEER [28], another geographic and energy-aware epidemic strategy published in 2020 for OMNs.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to assess the routing performance of DCEE-GIP, the opportunistic network environment (ONE) [11,12] simulator was adopted to perform numerous simulation experiments. For attesting to the superiority of DCEE-GIP, we chose direct delivery (DD) [5], which is the most energy-efficient routing algorithm (in theory), epidemic [8], which is the representative of flooding algorithms without any constraints, spray & wait [7], which is the classic routing algorithm with the best comprehensive performance, and EASE [23], which is an energy-efficient algorithm based on the sleep mechanism published in 2021 and GEER [28], another geographic and energy-aware epidemic strategy published in 2020 for OMNs.…”
Section: Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have simulated and analyzed the existing and proposed algorithms with ONE simulation [11,12], and the result shows that DCEE-GIP extends the network service time and successfully delivers the most messages. When compared with the five existing algorithms, the service time of DCEE-GIP increased by 8.05∼31.11%, and more messages were delivered by 14.82∼115.9%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TTL directly affects the delivery of messages in the DTN. As a result, the DTN established a deadline for the transmission of message copies [46,47]. The message is automatically deleted from all nodes if it is not delivered within the TTL.…”
Section: -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DRR can satisfy end-to-end latency bound on the order of milliseconds for realistic network scenarios. Whereas, for a Delay Tolerant Network (DTN), Ayub et al [40] have presented a mechanism to address the congestion originating from multiple copies (replicas) of packets that are sent for reliability. Multi-copy routing protocols duplicates the packets which results in a network congestion.…”
Section: B Queuing and Forwardingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dropping of packets should be done in a controlled way such that there is no negative impacts to the reliability mechanism. Ayub et al [40] mainly considers reactive dropping, i.e., dropping of packets only occurs when the queue overflows. This is achieved by a Priority Queue Based Reactive Buffer Management Policy (PQB-R) in an urban environment scenario.…”
Section: B Queuing and Forwardingmentioning
confidence: 99%