2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11227-017-2039-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prioritizing the solution of cloud service selection using integrated MCDM methods under Fuzzy environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted that Equations (19) and (20) are based on the adjusted weight w j of criterion c j , while Equation (21) is based on the original weight w j of c j .…”
Section: A Z-number-based Dnma Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted that Equations (19) and (20) are based on the adjusted weight w j of criterion c j , while Equation (21) is based on the original weight w j of c j .…”
Section: A Z-number-based Dnma Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step 5. We calculate utility values of CCM, UCM, and ICM by Equations (19), (20) and (21), respectively. The results are shown in Table 8.…”
Section: Dm1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most of the existing cloud service selection models are considered as QoS-aware evaluation focused models. In practice, the QoS attributes have problems like subjectivity, vagueness, and uncertainty [7]. For instance, the access reliability of cloud service is strongly affected by decision maker's subjective perception, and corresponding rating on this attribute is vague.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, a range of formats are involved to describe the QoS attributes, such as crisp data, interval data, triangular fuzzy number (TFN), and intuitionistic fuzzy number (IFN), etc. Although researchers have tried to solve these problems [7][8][9], existing models cannot handle these heterogeneous QoS attributes simultaneously. In this research, the heterogeneous QoS data are transformed into IFNs; then the heterogeneous QoS attributes can be handled simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%